Just so it can be clearly laid out what an out and out liar you are:
And now here I sit, some old drunk, with a history of mayhem and chaos behind me, with folks sending me discoveries which I must keep privy, for the purse you'll understand, and I itch with the bald effort of not posting such material here, but you see they must post it, not me, for the good of the community they should send it to the community, not me, and not you, but here.
And I await some solid, concrete and positive action from Silver, and the lady who recently pm'd me with details of the Cutbush clan.
Stand up and be counted.
Stand up and be counted.
Silver, you and me we have an issue here, so you just keep banging away at me boy, and I'll keep banging away at you, but to be honest your time would be more usefully employed in writing that book you keep on bleeting on about, so that everyone can enjoy your little secret... won't be yours though then eh? Oh my gosh, will you dare reveal all?
Your single claim to dubious fame gone forever... oh my gosh.
Just write it down on the message boards and advance this study, instead of hoarding it like some sunken Saxon treasure. For as sure as day is day someone is going to come along with a metal detector and lift it straight out of the ground right in front of you... your thunder a fart.
Your single claim to dubious fame gone forever... oh my gosh.
Just write it down on the message boards and advance this study, instead of hoarding it like some sunken Saxon treasure. For as sure as day is day someone is going to come along with a metal detector and lift it straight out of the ground right in front of you... your thunder a fart.
I saw a connection between the Gill murder and one of the Whitechapel Murders a long time before Silver arrived on scene, with his useful piece of information confirming my long held belief.
Actually Ally, if you go over to the other side, you'll find a link that Sam has posted to the original John Gill thread, started by me in response to a question from Sam on a podcast, and then you will see the dialogue, newspaper clippings and everything else, and then you will see Silver arriving on the scene sometime after all that... and do you know what? His big secret is already revealed in press cuttings before his arrival.
So his useful secret that confirmed your long held belief was already out there? Doesn't say much for your observation or reading skills does it? And you've been hounding him, in your own words, "banging away at him" to reveal a secret that according to you is already on the boards? Doesn't say much for your reasoning ability either.
Basically you're full of crap. I doubt sincerely that the piece of evidence Silver supposedly has and you find so interesting is already posted on the boards. You got caught flat out in a betrayal and now you are attempting to side step and say it wasn't really a betrayal at all, because the info was already out there. But whether the info is already out there is irrelevant, because, by your own words, you believed it to be secret. You believed Silver had secret information that he allowed you to be privy to, and you admit to harassing him in public about his secret in violation of a trust. Which makes you dishonest and untrustworthy and unlike others I don't mind setting it right out there and calling it what it is. You violated a trust. Period.
Leave a comment: