Hi everyone,
In the last year or so I have come across many an author subscribing to the belief that the Ripper was a sailor; a subscription certainly supported by Joseph Lawende and perhaps Israel Schwartz too. Indeed, many boats are recorded as docking and leaving at ideal times for one of its occupants to have committed the Whitechapel murders. However, while books like Jack the Ripper-the 21st Century investigation can certainly argue this point credibly and convincingly, one thing has always struck me as a flaw: if Jack the Ripper really was a sailor, or some sort of maritime employee surely he would have engaged in intercourse with one or more of the victims. Forgive me for being so blunt but considering the prolonged solitude endured by the typical sailor or fisherman of late Victoriana, surely the availability of sex presented by the five canonical victims would prove too appealing to be turned down.
One could argue that if the Ripper was a sailor he could merely have been to see another girl prior to meeting with the victims (if the need struck him) but considering it was customary for the prostitute of 1888 (and presumably of today too) to insist on payment prior to sex this would mean that the Ripper would ultimately have to pay two girls with his meager sailor earnings.
So that's my take on the sailor theory, if anyone has any points for or against you're welcome to make them.
Personally speaking, what has drawn me to the Ripper mystery has been the almost certain fiction of royalty/masonic connections and the 'romance' of the Victorian Villian as portrayed in From Hell and the like. I know the actuality of the Ripper was probably very different but its this fairytale icon (tophat, galdstone bag) that has perpetuated my interest-and the interest of most who would have ordinarily not been interested in the Whitechapel Fiend. For the Ripper to now be exposed as a prosaic fisherman or slaughterer (although both scenarios are just as likely as he being a Toff) then it would eradicate all the veneer afforded to him over the last century and expose him as what he was:a glamorless, bloody thug.
Yet, as is common knowledge, the Ripper did not engage in intercourse with Mary Jane and the like.
In the last year or so I have come across many an author subscribing to the belief that the Ripper was a sailor; a subscription certainly supported by Joseph Lawende and perhaps Israel Schwartz too. Indeed, many boats are recorded as docking and leaving at ideal times for one of its occupants to have committed the Whitechapel murders. However, while books like Jack the Ripper-the 21st Century investigation can certainly argue this point credibly and convincingly, one thing has always struck me as a flaw: if Jack the Ripper really was a sailor, or some sort of maritime employee surely he would have engaged in intercourse with one or more of the victims. Forgive me for being so blunt but considering the prolonged solitude endured by the typical sailor or fisherman of late Victoriana, surely the availability of sex presented by the five canonical victims would prove too appealing to be turned down.
One could argue that if the Ripper was a sailor he could merely have been to see another girl prior to meeting with the victims (if the need struck him) but considering it was customary for the prostitute of 1888 (and presumably of today too) to insist on payment prior to sex this would mean that the Ripper would ultimately have to pay two girls with his meager sailor earnings.
So that's my take on the sailor theory, if anyone has any points for or against you're welcome to make them.
Personally speaking, what has drawn me to the Ripper mystery has been the almost certain fiction of royalty/masonic connections and the 'romance' of the Victorian Villian as portrayed in From Hell and the like. I know the actuality of the Ripper was probably very different but its this fairytale icon (tophat, galdstone bag) that has perpetuated my interest-and the interest of most who would have ordinarily not been interested in the Whitechapel Fiend. For the Ripper to now be exposed as a prosaic fisherman or slaughterer (although both scenarios are just as likely as he being a Toff) then it would eradicate all the veneer afforded to him over the last century and expose him as what he was:a glamorless, bloody thug.
Yet, as is common knowledge, the Ripper did not engage in intercourse with Mary Jane and the like.
Comment