You know what, if Dale wanted to write a novel, I'd be fine with it. But to take certain flowers from a painting and decide that they represent a corpse, is very rohrschach-like. To be honest, it's uncomfortable for me. My brother and I used to look at freshly folded laundry outside our bedroom and see noses and chins and foreheads in the folds and imagine who they were. That doesn't mean my mother folded and arranged the laundry to present images to us. It meant we were imagining things. This is no doubt what Dale is going through and to think he's been seeing this for so many years. It's unsettling.
Mike
News Flash!! . . . VINCENT VAN GOGH WAS JACK THE RIPPER!!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by The Good Michael View PostYes, but it doesn't mean Dale isn't certain. What he sees however is similar to the sounds dogs hear, but I can't.
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by elleryqueen74 View PostDale,
If you are coming across hurdles and barriers to this book being published then surely one would think that by giving some more information about what you have "discovered" and some definitive "evidence" you say you have into your claim of "Vincent being Jack" could only help your cause and stir up some interest in your "theories".
Perpetually saying "you will have to buy the book" is clearly doing you no favors, as there is no book and so far it looks like no one wants to publish it.
Look I am very open minded and have read this entire thread out of interest to see what you provided as "evidence" and had a look at your website and really to my disappointment I have to agree with the others. Nothing you have yet provided remotely proves Vincent was Jack, it may open up a possibility but then you could do that with thousands of people of that era.
So in summing up I ask that you consider giving up more information if you have it, it can only help you in your ventures to get the truth out there. You keeping it to your chest until the "the book comes out" only smacks of someone wanting to get paid or get notoriety, not wanting the "truth" to come out.
All the best.
Leave a comment:
-
Dale,
If you are coming across hurdles and barriers to this book being published then surely one would think that by giving some more information about what you have "discovered" and some definitive "evidence" you say you have into your claim of "Vincent being Jack" could only help your cause and stir up some interest in your "theories".
Perpetually saying "you will have to buy the book" is clearly doing you no favors, as there is no book and so far it looks like no one wants to publish it.
Look I am very open minded and have read this entire thread out of interest to see what you provided as "evidence" and had a look at your website and really to my disappointment I have to agree with the others. Nothing you have yet provided remotely proves Vincent was Jack, it may open up a possibility but then you could do that with thousands of people of that era.
So in summing up I ask that you consider giving up more information if you have it, it can only help you in your ventures to get the truth out there. You keeping it to your chest until the "the book comes out" only smacks of someone wanting to get paid or get notoriety, not wanting the "truth" to come out.
All the best.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Vincent alias Jack View PostDon't know yet. It's been a long road, but I continue on my trek towards my destination. The fantastical nature of the concept continues to present a high hurdle for many. On the surface, it comes across as someone having a bit of fun on the internet--not to be taken serious. Add to this the numerous suspects who have previously been marched out as "the one," and the hurdle stretches taller. And it doesn't help to have Ripper stories that hit it big, only to have it turn out to be a wet bag full of . . . well, DNA of some sort. Ha! Causes fear for those who could get it out there.
I do have something in the works that could help lift people over the hurdle but, as with everything surrounding this book, it is taking forever to get to the conclusion of the matter. But hopefully soon.
Dying to get it out there so everyone's mind can be blown. I will never give up until I do. I've come too far, sacrificed too much, and I know what I have is the truth. I will find a way.
Thanks for asking and for the vote of confidence. I think you will find it is sane and sensible.
Dale Larner
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gnote View PostI would like to hear this interview.
I'm well aware i might not be able to handle the truth.
Oooops, looks like the page you requested could not be found. Please check the URL for proper spelling and capitalization.
Thanks,
Dale Larner
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostYep all it needs is some faulty DNA to make it the worst of all time [or maybe it already is].
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
I just listened to a radio interview with Dale Larner. It was pretty much all nonsense. This is worse than Lechmere.
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gnote View PostI agree but some people just don't want the truth revealed.
Is it possible the same people who knew Van Gogh was Jack the Ripper are related in some way to the people who are doing everything in their power to stop this from being published?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pinkmoon View PostWhen's the book coming out its about time we had a sane and sensible theory put forward .
Is it possible the same people who knew Van Gogh was Jack the Ripper are related in some way to the people who are doing everything in their power to stop this from being published?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: