Yes it is shocking to base a suspect on nothing but shallow speculation, with no real evidence. It lowers the tone of the casebook. Two many crackpot theories don't add to the credibility of the casebook.
Miss Marple
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
News Flash!! . . . VINCENT VAN GOGH WAS JACK THE RIPPER!!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Varqm View PostWhen is it right to denigrate a person who struggled, done well in his field and just tried to live as best he could. Cornwell and Larner are disgusting.The standards of proof in saying a guy is a murderer is high. It's not just some shallow speculation.
Cheers John
Leave a comment:
-
I think that Hinterkaifeck would be a great murder to begin investigating once it's decided that Vincent is JTR. It's a fascinating, half-forgotten case with some nightmarish elements.
Leave a comment:
-
When is it right to denigrate a person who struggled, done well in his field and just tried to live as best he could. Cornwell and Larner are disgusting.The standards of proof in saying a guy is a murderer is high. It's not just some shallow speculation.
Leave a comment:
-
When it is published I will buy a copy, Vincent alias Jack. I've always been interested in Vincent Van Gogh, who I think was a very talented individual.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostJust because Dale's floating around today spouting Vince = Jack, I wonder how his book's going. Post 1 Estimated release date July 2012.
Dale Larner
Leave a comment:
-
Just because Dale's floating around today spouting Vince = Jack, I wonder how his book's going. Post 1 Estimated release date July 2012.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Vincent alias Jack View PostI have no worries.
Vincent van Gogh was the man.
Thanks,
Dale Larner
Leave a comment:
-
Swiss Cheese
My take on the supposed DNA match to Jack the Ripper in the news:
“Swiss cheese tastes good, but it has lots of holes and smells bad.”
I have no worries.
Vincent van Gogh was the man.
Thanks,
Dale Larner
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post=Harry D;300928]Lighten up, Francis.
Sorry Pinkmoon - but what facts and what evidence? Are some wild imaginings concealed in a painting evidence? The known facts about Van Gogh at this time are that he was in France and did not have the means to travel to London. He was practically starving and sold almost all of his paintings to buy more paint and bread. Furthermore, if he had wanted to kill and mutilate prostitutes, there was no shortage of them in France.
Also, your comparisons are sweeping generalisations. In 1960, my father told my sister and brother that he believed man would walk on the moon within ten years. On the very day that he was buried in July 1969, the moon landings occurred. Additionally, throughout the 1970s, it was taken fro granted by my circle of friends that America would have a black president (and even, God forbid, a WOMAN president) before we reached thirty years of age.
The only respect that this theory deserves is the dignity and persistence shown by its author in the face of much scorn.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
I found that a very intruiging case, and slightly unsettling .... the footsteps in the snow coming, but not returning .....
Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
You could tempt me with a chainsaw Dave.
All the best
Dave
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TomTomKent View PostAgatha Christie. No reason to suspect her, no records of her being there and no reason to slur her name. But allow me to tell you at length that I have evidence, but not offer that evidence, which will solve this in a BIG way! Have an open mind! The stuff you have not evaluated yet might be really good!
On a more serious note, thank you for that fascinating link.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: