Tail-Gunner Joe
I totally agree that there were liberals who turned a blind eye to 'Uncle Joe' and his massacres of his own people and other countries. Some went much further and actively spied for the Russians.
But that's a police matter, not one for politicians and their partisan jockeying for votes.
If you want to have a real laugh see the American, war-time propaganda Warners movie 'Mission to Moscow', on youtube, with Stalin portrayed as a benign, articulate, Russian version of Roosevelt -- with a pipe -- and his bloodthirsty purges turned into fastidiously legal and just trials of guilty traitors!
I am not sure there has been such a grotesque inversion of the facts by Hollywood until Oliver Stone's 'JFK' (1991), which transformed an unscrupulous, lunatic D.A. and his malicious prosecution, into a courageous truth-seeker -- and the innocent defendant into a guilty conspirator!
It was this factor, the blindness of liberals to Stalin's on-going holocaust, which turned the very liberal Ronald Reagan into a far-right winger; eg. his nasty experiences with Hollywood Stalinists when he was head of the Screen Actor's Guild.
Yet it was also liberals, along with conservatives, eg. the East Coast establishment, who set up the Cold War policy of Containment
But that did not stop the unscrupulous Right from using anti-Communism to tarnish every liberal and Democrat (Truman?) as a fellow-traveler because they believed in values of the New Deal.
The other Joe, McCarthy, was an utter scoundrel and to refer to him in any kind of serious or approving way exposes a gaping ignorance about that vile senator's agenda, let alone his bullying methods. His methods were his agenda, for he was a liar on a truly awesome scale, and did enormous damage to the United States, the detritus of which lasts to his day -- Fox News anyone?
For example, McCarthy's efforts helped purge the State Dept of anybody who had predicted Mao's victory. That left behind the second-raters who had predicted Chiang's survival. Those well-meaning knuckleheads, like Dean Rusk, would later, well-meaningly, get us into the quagmire of Viet Nam.
'Tail-Gunner' Joe (even his heroic nickname was a lie) was not the slightest bit interested in Communism or espionage, he just loved headlines, gambling, boozing and wielding brute power -- and he knew that mud sticks especially if you throw a lot of it.
The Republicans unleashed this dangerous demagogue out of acute frustration with, unexpectedly, losing the '48 election to Truman.
But once Ike was safely elected they discovered, to their horror, that they could not put this evil genie back in his bottle, and so it was people like Ike and Nixon, and so on, who had to bring him down -- along with the liberal lawyer Joseph Welch at the Army-McCarthy Hearings.
McCarthy had accused the Army of being riddled with Reds, purely for personal reasons to do with his even more vile sidekick, Roy Cohn.
All of which hardly exonerates Eisenhower from not speaking up when McCarthy appallingly denigrated General Marshall as a traitor in '52.
Historically there were two other significant aspects to McCarthy.
To his credit he never deployed anti-Semitism as part of his mudslinging armoury. The other was that he was the first Catholic to garner mass suppoprt from Protestants, thus paving the way for his young pal, John F Kennedy, to [narrowly] win the Presidenacy over his former drinking buddy Nixon -- which could not have happened if Joe had married JFK's sister, as he almost did.
By the end of his shortish life, McCarthy, friendless, discredited and censured, looked around for another issue to bring back the glory and chose extending the welfare state, just like some unreconstructed New Dealer.
Though it did not work, and he died unmourned by all soon after, McCarthy's dark legacy lives on, and on. He is the fear, the 'Who-Lost-China' shadow, which propelled liberals to advise LBJ to escalate the Viet Nam War, to plunge us into a catastrophe to avoid the revival of McCarthysim without McCarthy-- George Ball and Clarke Clifford excepted
I totally agree that there were liberals who turned a blind eye to 'Uncle Joe' and his massacres of his own people and other countries. Some went much further and actively spied for the Russians.
But that's a police matter, not one for politicians and their partisan jockeying for votes.
If you want to have a real laugh see the American, war-time propaganda Warners movie 'Mission to Moscow', on youtube, with Stalin portrayed as a benign, articulate, Russian version of Roosevelt -- with a pipe -- and his bloodthirsty purges turned into fastidiously legal and just trials of guilty traitors!
I am not sure there has been such a grotesque inversion of the facts by Hollywood until Oliver Stone's 'JFK' (1991), which transformed an unscrupulous, lunatic D.A. and his malicious prosecution, into a courageous truth-seeker -- and the innocent defendant into a guilty conspirator!
It was this factor, the blindness of liberals to Stalin's on-going holocaust, which turned the very liberal Ronald Reagan into a far-right winger; eg. his nasty experiences with Hollywood Stalinists when he was head of the Screen Actor's Guild.
Yet it was also liberals, along with conservatives, eg. the East Coast establishment, who set up the Cold War policy of Containment
But that did not stop the unscrupulous Right from using anti-Communism to tarnish every liberal and Democrat (Truman?) as a fellow-traveler because they believed in values of the New Deal.
The other Joe, McCarthy, was an utter scoundrel and to refer to him in any kind of serious or approving way exposes a gaping ignorance about that vile senator's agenda, let alone his bullying methods. His methods were his agenda, for he was a liar on a truly awesome scale, and did enormous damage to the United States, the detritus of which lasts to his day -- Fox News anyone?
For example, McCarthy's efforts helped purge the State Dept of anybody who had predicted Mao's victory. That left behind the second-raters who had predicted Chiang's survival. Those well-meaning knuckleheads, like Dean Rusk, would later, well-meaningly, get us into the quagmire of Viet Nam.
'Tail-Gunner' Joe (even his heroic nickname was a lie) was not the slightest bit interested in Communism or espionage, he just loved headlines, gambling, boozing and wielding brute power -- and he knew that mud sticks especially if you throw a lot of it.
The Republicans unleashed this dangerous demagogue out of acute frustration with, unexpectedly, losing the '48 election to Truman.
But once Ike was safely elected they discovered, to their horror, that they could not put this evil genie back in his bottle, and so it was people like Ike and Nixon, and so on, who had to bring him down -- along with the liberal lawyer Joseph Welch at the Army-McCarthy Hearings.
McCarthy had accused the Army of being riddled with Reds, purely for personal reasons to do with his even more vile sidekick, Roy Cohn.
All of which hardly exonerates Eisenhower from not speaking up when McCarthy appallingly denigrated General Marshall as a traitor in '52.
Historically there were two other significant aspects to McCarthy.
To his credit he never deployed anti-Semitism as part of his mudslinging armoury. The other was that he was the first Catholic to garner mass suppoprt from Protestants, thus paving the way for his young pal, John F Kennedy, to [narrowly] win the Presidenacy over his former drinking buddy Nixon -- which could not have happened if Joe had married JFK's sister, as he almost did.
By the end of his shortish life, McCarthy, friendless, discredited and censured, looked around for another issue to bring back the glory and chose extending the welfare state, just like some unreconstructed New Dealer.
Though it did not work, and he died unmourned by all soon after, McCarthy's dark legacy lives on, and on. He is the fear, the 'Who-Lost-China' shadow, which propelled liberals to advise LBJ to escalate the Viet Nam War, to plunge us into a catastrophe to avoid the revival of McCarthysim without McCarthy-- George Ball and Clarke Clifford excepted
Comment