I think Dan Farson thought he'd solved it as well. Might be a little off topic, but it reminded me - check this out for a laugh. Just recently I ordered a second hand copy of Howells & Skinner's "The Ripper Legacy" off Ebay, it came from the UK, and right at the very end of the book, squeezed in with handwriting below the final paragraph, was this from some anonymous person:
"Druitt wasn't killer.
It was Walter Sickert - he was sexually deformed, collected uniforms (remember the soldiers who could not be traced,) had bolt holes in area. Used disguises - had been an actor. Painted prostitutes, etc."
Well, i'm convinced, how about you?
Anyway, yes, good luck once again Corey (and any other aspiring young researchers) - age isn't a factor and don't let the nay-sayers tell you otherwise.
Cheers,
Adam.
"Druitt wasn't killer.
It was Walter Sickert - he was sexually deformed, collected uniforms (remember the soldiers who could not be traced,) had bolt holes in area. Used disguises - had been an actor. Painted prostitutes, etc."
Well, i'm convinced, how about you?
Anyway, yes, good luck once again Corey (and any other aspiring young researchers) - age isn't a factor and don't let the nay-sayers tell you otherwise.
Cheers,
Adam.
Comment