Hi Victoria,
If Steve can write well, I have to wonder why he has chosen not to demonstrate his talent here.
I also have to wonder why you don't see it as dobbing on his best mate to get a book published which presumably aims to prove the accusations he has made here against him. And it wasn't just what Steve was 'told' by his best mate; it's also everything he claims to have witnessed with his own eyes, like the watch minus its Maybrick/Ripper engravings being shown to him before disappearing into another room with Park and emerging later with all the markings in situ. That's not something Steve could have conveniently forgotten until years after the flipping JtR tour and three or four diary books had been published featuring detailed descriptions of the watch.
I'm afraid Steve only has himself to blame for all the disbelief surrounding his stories. If I were to accept any of them at face value, just because you think he should be given a break, I might as well start believing Mike Barrett too, without insisting on some visible means of support.
If that sounds blunt, it's just a taste of what will come from better commentators than me if someone buys Steve's book and it turns out to be full of the provable twaddle he talks here.
Love,
Caz
X
If Steve can write well, I have to wonder why he has chosen not to demonstrate his talent here.
I also have to wonder why you don't see it as dobbing on his best mate to get a book published which presumably aims to prove the accusations he has made here against him. And it wasn't just what Steve was 'told' by his best mate; it's also everything he claims to have witnessed with his own eyes, like the watch minus its Maybrick/Ripper engravings being shown to him before disappearing into another room with Park and emerging later with all the markings in situ. That's not something Steve could have conveniently forgotten until years after the flipping JtR tour and three or four diary books had been published featuring detailed descriptions of the watch.
I'm afraid Steve only has himself to blame for all the disbelief surrounding his stories. If I were to accept any of them at face value, just because you think he should be given a break, I might as well start believing Mike Barrett too, without insisting on some visible means of support.
If that sounds blunt, it's just a taste of what will come from better commentators than me if someone buys Steve's book and it turns out to be full of the provable twaddle he talks here.
Love,
Caz
X
Comment