Originally posted by Robert
View Post
Robert
Just for the sake of argument,
the referendum was not legally binding, it was described I believe as advisory.
Now the Members are too concerned about losing their salaries not to vote no, but what if they voted in what they actually believed for once?
Seriously what then?
The point is John is not wrong, from a legal point of view!
You also suggest two scenarios, which the monarch does not have the power to enact, the powers they have are extremely limited.
It is a point to wonder about
Steve
steve
Leave a comment: