Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who Killed Julia Wallace? - New Evidence
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
These aren’t showing up for some reason Sherlock.
Maybe try again a little later. Just logged in and they are showing up on my laptop.*************************************
"A body of men, HOLDING THEMSELVES ACCOUNTABLE TO NOBODY, ought not to be trusted by anybody." --Thomas Paine ["Rights of Man"]
"Justice is an ideal which transcends the expedience of the State, or the sensitivities of Government officials, or private individuals. IT HAS TO BE PURSUED WHATEVER THE COST IN PEACE OF MIND TO THOSE CONCERNED." --'Justice of the Peace' [July 12th 1975]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sherlock Houses View Post
Hi HS,
Maybe try again a little later. Just logged in and they are showing up on my laptop.
Hi Sherlock,
Im a complete cave man when it comes to technology but I have an iPad (wasted on me) so I don’t know if that has anything to do with those articles not appearing?Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Hi Sherlock,
Im a complete cave man when it comes to technology but I have an iPad (wasted on me) so I don’t know if that has anything to do with those articles not appearing?
For some mysterious reason they have now done a vanishing act. Gremlins in the works. I'll try posting each related article separately in chronological order a little later today and see if that's successful. They certainly give revealing pause for thought about Parry's and Lily Fitzsimon's characters.Last edited by Sherlock Houses; 11-21-2019, 11:02 AM.*************************************
"A body of men, HOLDING THEMSELVES ACCOUNTABLE TO NOBODY, ought not to be trusted by anybody." --Thomas Paine ["Rights of Man"]
"Justice is an ideal which transcends the expedience of the State, or the sensitivities of Government officials, or private individuals. IT HAS TO BE PURSUED WHATEVER THE COST IN PEACE OF MIND TO THOSE CONCERNED." --'Justice of the Peace' [July 12th 1975]
Comment
-
Article 1 of 4.......
*************************************
"A body of men, HOLDING THEMSELVES ACCOUNTABLE TO NOBODY, ought not to be trusted by anybody." --Thomas Paine ["Rights of Man"]
"Justice is an ideal which transcends the expedience of the State, or the sensitivities of Government officials, or private individuals. IT HAS TO BE PURSUED WHATEVER THE COST IN PEACE OF MIND TO THOSE CONCERNED." --'Justice of the Peace' [July 12th 1975]
Comment
-
Article 2 of 4.............
*************************************
"A body of men, HOLDING THEMSELVES ACCOUNTABLE TO NOBODY, ought not to be trusted by anybody." --Thomas Paine ["Rights of Man"]
"Justice is an ideal which transcends the expedience of the State, or the sensitivities of Government officials, or private individuals. IT HAS TO BE PURSUED WHATEVER THE COST IN PEACE OF MIND TO THOSE CONCERNED." --'Justice of the Peace' [July 12th 1975]
Comment
-
Article 3 of 4 ............
*************************************
"A body of men, HOLDING THEMSELVES ACCOUNTABLE TO NOBODY, ought not to be trusted by anybody." --Thomas Paine ["Rights of Man"]
"Justice is an ideal which transcends the expedience of the State, or the sensitivities of Government officials, or private individuals. IT HAS TO BE PURSUED WHATEVER THE COST IN PEACE OF MIND TO THOSE CONCERNED." --'Justice of the Peace' [July 12th 1975]
Comment
-
Article 4 of 4..............
*************************************
"A body of men, HOLDING THEMSELVES ACCOUNTABLE TO NOBODY, ought not to be trusted by anybody." --Thomas Paine ["Rights of Man"]
"Justice is an ideal which transcends the expedience of the State, or the sensitivities of Government officials, or private individuals. IT HAS TO BE PURSUED WHATEVER THE COST IN PEACE OF MIND TO THOSE CONCERNED." --'Justice of the Peace' [July 12th 1975]
Comment
-
Originally posted by WallaceWackedHer View PostCaird, on the night of the murder, said he was at his home (which is of course 30 seconds from Wallace's house) by 7.45 PM. It's in the police files.
*************************************
"A body of men, HOLDING THEMSELVES ACCOUNTABLE TO NOBODY, ought not to be trusted by anybody." --Thomas Paine ["Rights of Man"]
"Justice is an ideal which transcends the expedience of the State, or the sensitivities of Government officials, or private individuals. IT HAS TO BE PURSUED WHATEVER THE COST IN PEACE OF MIND TO THOSE CONCERNED." --'Justice of the Peace' [July 12th 1975]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sherlock Houses View Post
Excuse my nitpicking here WWH, but the distance from Wallace's front door to Caird's front door is almost exactly 160 yards, which takes about a minute and a half. I know, I walked it last night with my little dog Max. 30 seconds if you're a Linford Christie.
They're basically neighbours:
The route from the back of Wallace's to Caird's (the escape route) is illustrated by the red line. If he went home first then to Wallace's he'd possibly go to the front door, though we can't be 100% sure of what precisely took place (e.g. in a distraction robbery someone unknown to Julia would probably be at the front door and an accomplice in the back) or whether Caird himself did anything more than ensure receipt of the call IF he's even involved at all.
It should just be kept in mind that he is a very underinvestigated lead in the case, and on facts alone and nothing more, he is the most likely candidate for involvement in the crime if Wallace is innocent. We can establish he has ALL knowledge and means necessary to have taken part, and know for a fact he was around the home within the window of time Julia died in. We do not know those things factually in the case of any other suspect, but with Caird it's all proven.
Also Wallace walked past Caird's home on his way to the first tram stop on the night of the murder. There's not enough investigation on Caird to refute or know for sure when he arrived home, but if he (or an accomplice/friend/family member) was at his Letchworth Street home, they could quite literally watch Wallace go on the trip from the window lol. They would actually see him walk by... And Caird knew which route Wallace was going to take since he (Caird) questioned him on it, in a rather pressing manner actually.Last edited by WallaceWackedHer; 11-21-2019, 04:35 PM.
Comment
-
From previous posts I was under the delusory impression that Caird, was living in a location that gave him a perfect sentry position for comings and goings at the Wallace household. Clearly from your map, WWH, this is not the case, in fact in order to reconnoiter Wallace’s home , it would be necessary to negotiate a couple of street turns , and then only be able to observe one entrance to the Wolverton home.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Comment
-
Yawn...
"Also Wallace walked past Caird's home on his way to the first tram stop on the night of the murder...."
NOPE.
You see, anyone who knows the area, or is a real researcher of the case, understands that no-one would take that unnecessary, fanciful route.
Because there was an alley next to 24 Richmond Park (next to the Church Institute) which leads into Sedley Street, A left turn into Pendennis Street, then a right into Castlewood Road leads to Belmont Road where Wallace caught a Number 26 tram on the night of the murder.
The correct alley route is the one filmed in the excellent "Man from the Pru" film... (excellent when it sticks to facts, less so with its flights of fancy)
Oh, and I do hope all those sock-puppets who spent a thread talking gibberish to themselves took their one chance offered by the Mods to fess-up?Last edited by RodCrosby; 11-21-2019, 08:55 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by moste View PostFrom previous posts I was under the delusory impression that Caird, was living in a location that gave him a perfect sentry position for comings and goings at the Wallace household. Clearly from your map, WWH, this is not the case, in fact in order to reconnoiter Wallace’s home , it would be necessary to negotiate a couple of street turns , and then only be able to observe one entrance to the Wolverton home.
Thanks for clearing that up.
He can watch one way from his actual home.
He wouldn't have to watch both entrances anyway, but if someone did, at WORST it's one turn. They only have to stand at the bottom of Richmond Park, NOT on the Breck Road end, the other side.
Comment
Comment