If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
well you can just ask kate or read her book. shell give you all the gory details.
I can't Abby because I'm not prepared to give money to someone who is a best guilty of child neglect. Also I'm not yet convinced the McCann's are clever enough to have murdered their own child and covered it up effectively.
I can't Abby because I'm not prepared to give money to someone who is a best guilty of child neglect. Also I'm not yet convinced the McCann's are clever enough to have murdered their own child and covered it up effectively.
Academically smart maybe, but to outwit a Police force which has all kinds of investigative skills at its disposal takes some doing, regardless of how incompetent the force appears to be.
Anyone know of any TV programmes/documentaries that have been made about Madeline’s disappearance?
Academically smart maybe, but to outwit a Police force which has all kinds of investigative skills at its disposal takes some doing, regardless of how incompetent the force appears to be.
Anyone know of any TV programmes/documentaries that have been made about Madeline’s disappearance?
Doctors are not necessarily that clever. They are clearly people who are academically gifted. However how clever are two people who admit to leaving young children alone?
Doctors are not necessarily that clever. They are clearly people who are academically gifted. However how clever are two people who admit to leaving young children alone?
Extremely clever, if your best possible alibi is not being there.
There's a weird benefit to a story that makes you look bad -- it seems true.
For instance look at Israel Schwartz. A big reason people take his testimony so seriously is that he admits to running away from the attackers. There's no glory in his role as a potential Ripper suspect.
So by admitting to the lesser misdeed of gross child neglect, you've saved yourself from any potential suspicion of a more serious allegation.
A lot of times saying "I'm as pure as the driven snow and have never done anything wrong in my life" won't get you as far as saying "Look, I've done some bad stuff in my time, but NOTHING like this."
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
No knowledge of its worth or truth.
watching now-thanks for posting.
one thing that struck me is that when Kate describes what happened, its clear that she thought the maddy had been taken-open window, wooshing curtains etc.. she says this several times, then and later .she also states the bedroom door was open and that they think the abductor or abductors may have been in the room more than once, in between the checks even.
so she immediately thinks shes been taken. runs back to the restaurant yelling this. BUT LEAVES THE TWIN BABIES. eventhough the abductor/s may still be about.
BUSTED. NO one, and I mean no innocent parent, under these circumstances
would leave twin babies alone again. she would scoop them up and carry with her and get out (not only to not leave them alone but out of sheer fear of the immenant danger of an abductor). or less likely stay with the twins and call for help.
no one would rush out and leave the babies in immanent danger. NO ONE!!
BUSTED. MCCANNS did it. no question.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Extremely clever, if your best possible alibi is not being there.
There's a weird benefit to a story that makes you look bad -- it seems true.
For instance look at Israel Schwartz. A big reason people take his testimony so seriously is that he admits to running away from the attackers. There's no glory in his role as a potential Ripper suspect.
So by admitting to the lesser misdeed of gross child neglect, you've saved yourself from any potential suspicion of a more serious allegation.
A lot of times saying "I'm as pure as the driven snow and have never done anything wrong in my life" won't get you as far as saying "Look, I've done some bad stuff in my time, but NOTHING like this."
That's all well and good but the McCann's have admitted to leaving there children alone several times while on that holiday. Also what has Israel Schwartz got to do with it? There's no reason to disbelieve what he says as he looks bad and there is nothing else to suggest he may have been Jack.
One thing that always stood out for me is that people who doubt the McCanns say that they tried to originally claim that someone had broken in the window or gone out it or both. Even if that were true, then why not actually jimmy the window to make it look like that? In fact why didn't they stage anything at all? If they can hide a body and plan all these theatrics you think they could make it look like someone had broken in to snatch her?
There isn't a shred of evidence for anything being staged.
One thing that always stood out for me is that people who doubt the McCanns say that they tried to originally claim that someone had broken in the window or gone out it or both. Even if that were true, then why not actually jimmy the window to make it look like that? In fact why didn't they stage anything at all? If they can hide a body and plan all these theatrics you think they could make it look like someone had broken in to snatch her?
There isn't a shred of evidence for anything being staged.
Why not if they are hiding something?
well an open window makes it seem like it was an intruder-why cant they have staged an open window? sounds pretty easy to me.
BTW-the only fingerprints at all found on the window were Kates.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
One thing that always stood out for me is that people who doubt the McCanns say that they tried to originally claim that someone had broken in the window or gone out it or both. Even if that were true, then why not actually jimmy the window to make it look like that? In fact why didn't they stage anything at all? If they can hide a body and plan all these theatrics you think they could make it look like someone had broken in to snatch her?
There isn't a shred of evidence for anything being staged.
Why not if they are hiding something?
Hi Batman
I'm starting to think there is very little evidence of anything as Maddie was kidnapped by someone who had done it before. Maybe the key to solving the case is to look at suspects in the area at the time, who had both the motivation and knowledge to commit the crime leaving little evidence. However I suspect that whoever did it will never be caught. Unless they are apprehended for something else.
I'm starting to think there is very little evidence of anything as Maddie was kidnapped by someone who had done it before. Maybe the key to solving the case is to look at suspects in the area at the time, who had both the motivation and knowledge to commit the crime leaving little evidence. However I suspect that whoever did it will never be caught. Unless they are apprehended for something else.
Cheers John
I think that is most likely given the history of the hotel. They haven't even accounted for everybody. The investigation a shambles. CCTV footage allowed to be deleted. Not even checking who the creche parents were.
I think that is most likely given the history of the hotel. They haven't even accounted for everybody. The investigation a shambles. CCTV footage allowed to be deleted. Not even checking who the creche parents were.
Hi Batman
That is absolutely appalling and sickening. I feel extremely sorry for Maddie and her siblings.
Comment