JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

[Patrick Differ]

The sketch here illustrates serious problems with the WC. It does not matter what Parkland said as they had only 20 minutes to perform life saving techniques. Their were first impressions of wounds based on their experience that do not match WC findings...which were incomplete. Trauma Doctors are not inexperienced and these certainly were not.

The sketch shows the offsets and illustrates how the Single Bullet simply does not align on the vertical and horizontal planes. Plus the acute angles from above and to the sides were acute and moving.

Yet the government would have you believe there was a perfect alignment in this case. If that's true then please explain how?
unfortunately Humes did not trace the bullet path in the throat.

I know i keep repeating but so are the posts.

[GBinOz]

You can produce any number of items and I’ll still say what’s the truth. The accusations levelled against Humes, Boswell and Finck are a pathetic, sick joke. Too many people over the years have had too little to do but try and trash the reputations of thoroughly decent men who have no stain against their characters.

I have presented the cover sheet from the autopsy. How is that accusative or trashing of Boswell? Is it because it doesn't represent what you consider to be the truth?

[Herlock Sholmes]

You can produce any number of items and I’ll still say what’s the truth. The accusations levelled against Humes, Boswell and Finck are a pathetic, sick joke. Too many people over the years have had too little to do but try and trash the reputations of thoroughly decent men who have no stain against their characters.

[Herlock Sholmes]

You have previously used the quote of "absolutely" regarding the testimony of Dr Carrico. His testimony from the Warren Commission here, but a search on "absolutely" has a zero return:

https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh3/pdf/WH3_Carrico.pdf

What Specter does is present his wound in the back of the neck as fact (which it obviously isn't) and asks for a response based totally on the assumption that the fallacy is fact. This is typical of the devious badgering techniques used at the WC.

Mr. Specter. Permit me to add some facts which I shall ask you to assume as being true for purposes of having you express an opinion. First of all, assume that the President was struck by a a 6.5 mm. copper jacketed bullet from a rifle having a muzzle velocity of approximately 2,00O feet per second at a .time when the President was approximately 160 to 250 feet from the weapon, with the President being struck from the rear at a downward angle of approximately 45 degrees, being struck on the upper right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the scapula 14 centimeters from the tip of the right acromlon process and 14 centimeters below the tip of the right mastoid process. Assume further that the missile passed through the body of the President striking no bones, traversing the neck and sliding between the large muscles in the posterior aspect of the President’s body through a fascia channel without violating the pleural cavity, but bruising only the apex of the right pleural cavity and bruising the most apical portion of the right lung, then causing a hematoma to the right of the larynx which you have described, and creating a jagged wound in the trachea, then exiting precisely at the point where you observe the puncture wound to exist. Now based on those facts was the appearance of the wound in your opinion consistent with being an exit wound.
Dr. Carrico. It certainly was. It could have been under the circumstances.
Mr. Specter. And assuming that all the facts which I have given you to be true, do you have an opinion with a reasonable degree of medical certainty as to whether, in fact, the wound was an entrance wound or an exit wound?
Dr. Carrico. With those facts and the fact as I understand it no other bullet was found this would be, this was, I believe, was an exit wound.

This is the autopsy cover sheet prepared by Boswell and signed off by Burkley.


It shows the throat incision and the bullet wound in the back, not the neck, which is clearly well below the neck incision. It also shows the small wound in the temple and the large wound in the occipital area at the back of the head.
Do I hear shouts of "fake" from the playground?

Who are the "17 pathologists" to whom you refer?

It was from an interview with Vince Bugliosi.

[Patrick Differ]

The Single Bullet Theory has been confirmed as possible by modern ballistic experts, such as Luke Haag.

The Single Bullet Theory is one of many ballistic theories in this case. It fails in a major respect because Humes did not complete the Autopsy in tracing it's path.

The Single Bullet Theory fails the trajectory and alignment test in terms of acute angles and alignment of Kennedy and Connally. This is also proven using technology and photographic evidence.

I agree with you Fiver that the Single Bullet would be possible. But it would have to meet certain tests as mentioned. Humes own Autopsy sketches show an offset from the back wound and throat of several inches. The sketches that show a straight line path that Humes used in his testimony was not based on photographic evidence as access was not granted.

Because Humes failed to trace the neck wound, the possibility of the throat wound being an entrance wound is Possible.

The Single Bullet became invalid because Humes failed to trace the throat wound. But Specter and the WC needed Oswald to be guilty so the Country would not have to sit through months of trials, like OJ Simpson.