JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

[cobalt]

After the shooting these moronic plotters left themselves these things to do…

There then follows a list of strawmen, ripe for burning.

It has been pointed out on numerous occasions that the lone gunman theory is a figment of the WC imagination and no more. The assassins in Dealey Plaza set out to kill the POTUS and they succeeded. Why on earth would they care about photographs of the Grassy Knoll or direction of bullets? All they needed was a link to Cuba (Oswald) and a rifle on the 6th floor.

Johnson partly scuppered their plans by steering the lone gunman theory which, in its WC form, depoliticised the crime.

[Fiver]

Shooting from inside a high rise building, or from behind a fence, offered more concealment than anything on offer at the other two locations, Ft. Worth and the Trade Mart. Both the latter two were obvious 'hotspots' where the Security Detail would be on their mettle. By the time the motorcade was heading for the Stemmons Freeway crowds had thinned and any threat in the minds of the security men would be nearer to amber alert rather than red alert.

Security would likely relax around Dealey Plaza, so that is a point for Dealey Plaza.

Outside the Hotel Texas in Ft Worth, JFK was surrounded by high rise buildings. And standing still for several minutes on a raised platform, both of which makes for an easier target an a lot more time to aim. And there's a clearer line of sight than at Dealey Plaza. And the raised platform was surrounded by hundreds of people, which would both distract JFK's security and mean security would have to fight their way through the crowd to try to pursue a gunman.

[Herlock Sholmes]

“The fact that there was a massive head wound is obvious.”


If it’s so obvious Patrick then why did at least 6 doctors disagree? Why are those wrong? I’m sorry Patrick but you are doing what conspiracy theorists always do. You overcomplicate.

Dr. Charles Carrico was at Kennedy’s head; no one got closer. He thought that he saw a wound at the back of Kennedy’s head but he admitted that ‘absolutely’ they could have been wrong. If Carrico can easily admit of this possibility then the question has to be…why are conspiracy theorists (none of whom were there of course) so absolutely intransigent in their belief that no such mistake could have been made? I think that we all know why…it’s because their belief in conspiracy is of the level of a religious faith and all must comply to this.

In crime, we don’t discard physical evidence, the autopsy photographs and the x-rays have been proven many times to have been totally genuine. The Zapruder film is also 100% genuine and proves beyond any doubt at all that there was no wound to the back of Kennedy’s head. This is proven and no further discussion on it is needed. Those online that says it’s faked are lying. Simple as that.

The autopsy was 100% genuine. Any attempt to say that it wasn’t deserves no response because it’s a sick joke perpetrated on the public by those who seek to benefit from it.

There is not a group of conspirators in the entire history of this planet or any other (including potential parallel universes) that would have left themselves so much to do post shooting. Note Patrick, I’m not stating that it’s doubtful, I’m stating my thoughts as clearly as possible…it is physically and logically impossible for this ‘conspiracy’ to have taken place.

After the shooting these moronic plotters left themselves these things to do…



To plant prints on Oswald’s on the rifle and around the nest.

To leave three cartridges and keep their fingers crossed that no one found a fourth bullet.

According to some…remove a Mauser.

Hoped that Oswald didn’t blab.

Hoped that no one saw a non-Oswald’s shooter leave the building.

Hoped that the authorities gathered in every single photograph and cinematic film without fail.

Hoped that no one saw a Grassy Knoll gunman.

Hoped that the GK gunman didn’t hit Kennedy’s in such a way that 100% proved a shot from the front.

Hoped that no one at Parkland noticed a huge (non-existent) back of the head wound.

Convinced 3 men of high reputation to betray their country and President.

Hoped and prayed that no one ever had a rush of conscience and owned up to the plot.

Convinced the 14 pathologists that followed (including major conspiracy theorist Cyril Wecht) to betray their country and to risk their reputations in supporting the autopsy conclusions.

Hoping that no one from the HSCA had an attack of conscience and owned up to lying.

Convinced Oswald’s wife, brother and friends to support his guilt.

To frame him for the Walker assassination attempt.



No doubt we could add many more. So you would have to believe that our conspirators lumbered themselves with this categorically impossible ‘to do’ list when they could have had Kennedy killed without any of these. Simply and efficiently.

No. We cannot give this a minutes credence. Conspiracy theorist are just wrong. But how can we discuss the case properly Patrick when people keep bleating about ‘fakes’ or ‘forgeries.’ It’s like trying to explain how someone escaped by saying “what if he could fly and we didn’t notice.” Nothing is more frustrating than the fact that conspiracy theorists have created their own list of ‘get outs.’ We see this tactic online all the time. If you have no answer…label someone, call them a name. It’s an obfuscation tactic.




Common sense, respect for evidence, reason and logic tell us that Oswald killed Kennedy.

[Patrick Differ]

Herlock- since you called me out regarding Fishy's ongoing responses - I assume meaning Conspiracy Theorists v Warren Commission- I will give it a shot in the interest of civil debate.

For me the angles, timing and photographic evidence illustrate a different conclusion than the WC Report makes. In truth, the Parkland Doctors only had 20 minutes in a fruitless effort to save Kennedy surrounded by Secret Service and FBI and staff.

The fact that there was a massive head wound is obvious. In Parkland they were trying not to move the head but entrance and exit matter. The Parkland Doctors, with gunshot wound experience, they were trauma Doctors, thought the neck wound was entrance and head wound was at the temple. In Zapruder we see Kennedy grab his neck and Connally not immediately reacting. Immediate is not an easy analysis because you are dealing in 18.3 frames per second or the Zapruder film speed.

But there is another issue for me and this is an easier test. Where was Connally sitting ,, where was Kennedy sitting and where was the 6th floor window in relation to both? In other words, was there an alignment that matches the single bullet theory?
That answer is NO ! Take a look at the Photo that shows the first Large X on Elm Street in relation to the 6th Floor. It illustrates a major problem with the Single Bullet Theory
First, the angle from the 6th Floor downwards to Kennedy is 6 stories minus several feet ( bottom of Street to Kennedys back and neck)
Second, the horizontal distance to the X ( edge of 6th floor window to Kennedys back, is about 60 ft. Plus the Car orientation is perpendicular to the road putting Connally , who is sitting in front of Kennedy and like Kennedy resting an arm on the same horizontal plane, would require Connally to be offset 10 inches to the right of where he was sitting for a pass through alignment of the single bullet. Basic Geometry.
( Not only can you easy visualize this in photographs the laser scans guys proved it using digital twin technology).

In order for the single bullet to work consider the mechanical facts. A shooter firing downwards and to the left away from the window strikes Kennedys back, then moves left and up a few degrees and makes an exit out the neck In a perfectly straight trajectory ( 1/4 inch round hole in the neck) and then travels downwards again and enters Connally who is sitting directly in line with Kennedy on the horizontal plane , hits the 5th rib , exits again goes through Connallys wrist and lodges in his thigh. Then it pops out and is found on Connallys gurney.

Except Connally was not sitting 10 inches to Kennedys left. But the magic bullet was needed to explain Oswald.

The WC needed to have Oswald as the guy so the government and People could move on. I get that. But what was true?

Humes was just as frustrated as others in having to short circuit the Autopsy. He also felt pressure and was unhappy with the Autopsy sketches that he had to base his testimony on. In his words, the sketches were done by the artist who did not have access to the Autopsy photos.

For me the head shot is similar to the Single Bullet. Somehow through neck spasms the laws of Newton do not apply. The debris field matches the head direction in the Zapruder film. The government will have us believe a bullet hit Kennedy in the back and then exploded out the front at the temple. The Zapruder film shows no entrance spark or anything of that nature. But in this case, unlike the Single Pristine bullet , this bullet shatters inside the brain from compression ?
Yet the Zapruder film does not show what you originally see. A head shot to the temple forcing the head back and to the left which is seen in the film.

Humes admits the sketches were not based on Autopsy photos or xrays. Why not? Who knows?

Oswald could have been a shooter. But the Zapruder film and other photos show something else. These are not the Drones you are looking for.

[cobalt]

Fiver wrote:

So why do you feel it was necessary for anyone other than LHO to kill JD Tippit?

It's a fair question. I think we CTs tend to focus on the perceived weakness of the evidence that places Oswald at the Tippit shooting: timings, ID evidence, shell casings, Texas Theatre witnesses etc. But if not Oswald, then who and why?

We assume the Tippit killing was linked to the JFK assassination. A Dallas officer had not been killed on duty for around a dozen years so it would be one almighty coincidence for that to happen within 45 minutes of the presidential murder. The manner of the killing- more akin to a professional execution rather than a fleeing felon shooting his way out- would indicate something out of the ordinary as well. The fact that the murderer was confronted whilst apparently doing no more than walking along the sidewalk, yet felt the need to resort to violence so quickly, also lends weight to a link with the JFK assassination. So I will work on the basis that the two murders were connected.

The answer must lie in the reason why Tippit pulled up his police car and approached a member of the public. The notion that this person matched the description seems insufficient. Tippit had been driving around for about 20 minutes after this radio bulletin and must have passed half a dozen such persons: even if the walker was a rough match there had to be some further reason for Tippit to stop. He had no reason to assume an assassin from Dealey Plaza would be out for a stroll in Oak Cliff. Had Tippit been detailed to a roadblock near the crime scene, or asked to scrutinise rail and bus stations (did these basic procedures take place that day?) then that would have been a different matter. So I can't believe he nonchalantly confronted a pedestrian on wild suspicion; but then neither was this a routine stop given what transpired.

So why did Tippit stop? Well, we know his behaviour was reportedly erratic around this time. His sitting parked outside the GLOCO station- which I think predates his radio instruction to move into that general area- is well supported. The failed telephone call from the Top Ten Record shop and the hard stop of the Andrews' vehicle are not so definite but do correspond to the overall picture of the man who accelerated away from the GLOCO station. Bizarrely, Tippit was considered such a familiar presence in Oak Cliff, an area few miles from his regular beat, that some witnesses actually assumed he was a local patrol officer. Tippit had some connection with the Oak Cliff area that predated the assassination and has never been satisfactorily explained.

So who killed Tippit? I think Tippit was killed by a person connected to the JFK assassination and I don't mean Oswald obviously. I think he knew, by sight at least, the person he stopped and that person viewed Tippit as an immediate danger to the conspiracy.

But why was it necessary to kill a police officer in broad daylight? Well, once your group has shot the POTUS an officer is not such a big deal. Tippit, rather like Oswald, was beginning to realise that events had spiralled out of control and sensed a danger to himself. Both men were killed/arrested within an hour of each other reaching for a weapon. Tippit's stopping of the pedestrian was an attempt to regain some control over events, an action which was not welcomed.