JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

    So all the witnesses who saw the person that wasn't Oswald shoot tippet, they lied , were mistaken , were idiots , didn't exist?

    Maybe we should put your dozen in that category .?
    Your position requires that the over a dozen witnesses who saw Oswald shoot Tippit or flee the scene are liars. Your position requires everyone who saw Oswald attempt to use his gun are liars. Your position requires that the Dallas police fake the evidence. Your position requires that all forensics experts brought in as well as most of every committee that examined the Tippit killing are liars.

    So you're calling at least 60 people liars.

    Against that we have the Clemmons, Wright, and Holan stories which contradict each other on every point yet you believe all three of them to be true.


    Leave a comment:


  • GBinOz
    replied
    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

    That being said George ,we agree the fatal shot came from the front .
    The forensics evidence shows the fatal shot came from the south knoll. I do not discount a possible almost simultaneous shot from the rear, but from a lower vantage point than the TSBD.
    Last edited by GBinOz; 03-25-2025, 12:13 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GBinOz
    replied
    Originally posted by FrankO View Post
    I know what she said: that her husband's wounds were all caused by one bullet, the second of 3 in total that were fired. According to the governor that wasn't before frame 130 in the Zapruder film, but the thing is that he held his right hand at about shoulder level from frame 128 or so to at least frame 179 and then again at least from frame 320 until 330. So, the point is: how can he have been hit both in his upperbody and his wrist by a downward shot when he held his hand, holding the hat, clearly above the point of exit in his upperbody? And how could he still have held his hat after the third and, according to the Connally's, final shot?
    Hi Frank,

    Just to be absolutely clear, you are suggesting, as am I, that Connally's injuries could not have been caused by one bullet?

    Best regards, George

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Humes, Boswell and Finck….thoroughly honest, decent, patriotic men…viciously and unfairly maligned by conspiracy theorists who are only interested in promoting their own biased, largely politically motivated interests.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Arlen Specter…..a totally honest man…..used the tools available to him to show how one bullet could have hit both men…..admitted that he couldn’t know whether time would prove him mistaken….reproduction using technology proved him 100% correct.

    We should now call it the single bullet fact. Which leaves us with only one magic bullet. The disappearing bullet the conspiracy theorists have never come up with an explanation for.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X