JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FrankO
    replied
    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post


    Why dont i just let Nellie Connally explain it to you [6 mins in ]


    If that isnt enough , just remember, your about to call this women a liar, who btw was in the limo on the most famous day of the most famous assassination of out time . Most likely even before you took your first breath on this planet!!! . Do you and herlock even realise how dumb , stupid and idiotic that looks ????
    ​Governor Connally's Story


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpBf...=VincePalamara
    I know what she said: that her husband's wounds were all caused by one bullet, the second of 3 in total that were fired. According to the governor that wasn't before frame 130 in the Zapruder film, but the thing is that he held his right hand at about shoulder level from frame 128 or so to at least frame 179 and then again at least from frame 320 until 330. So, the point is: how can he have been hit both in his upperbody and his wrist by a downward shot when he held his hand, holding the hat, clearly above the point of exit in his upperbody? And how could he still have held his hat after the third and, according to the Connally's, final shot?

    And I'm not calling or going to call this woman a liar. I call her human and human memory isn't a recording machine, unlike a camera.

    Leave a comment:


  • FISHY1118
    replied

    Actual evidence [by request ]


    Exposing the Warren Commision lie, again.......






    Roger Craig and the 7.65 Mauser





    [4.mins 51 secs]




    Dallas County Sheriff's Deputy Roger Craig tells the story of how police found a 7.65 Mauser in the Texas School Book Depository on November 22, 1963. His story is supported by the sworn affidavits of Sheriff's Deputy Eugene Boone and Deputy Constable Seymour Weitzman. Boone later recanted his description and Weitzman refused to talk about it, but Craig never wavered.

    Note: the weapon's identification as a Mannlicher-Carcano was not released to the press until after authorities "found" records that Oswald had purchased such a weapon.



    Remarkable that such a hugely important identification claim of the rifle used to kill the President could make it to the highest level of national news broadcasts with our most famous TV news broadcasters like Charles Collingswood and Walter Cronkite himself being allowed to report that the rifle was ID'd as a Mauser (for two days! ) before someone back in Dallas got it right?

    Seems someone like Day and especially Constable Seymour Weitzman himself would have caught their mistaken ID before their Mauser ID went national.

    Didn't Weitzman wait one or more days before going on TV to publicly correct his mistaken ID for the found rifle? Seems he would have caught his mistake as soon as Cronkite and dozens of other national news people were telling the world of his identification of the murder weapon as a Mauser the day and evening of the assassination.

    That long time period before Weitzman sheepishly and embarrassingly confessing his grossly negligent ID of the rifle is what gives me suspicion thoughts about the whole affair.



    I've seen it argued that the misidentification was because they just glanced at it.

    First of all, what cop "glances" at at what is a murder weapon and the most important piece of evidence they will ever touch in their entire lifetimes?

    Second "glancing at it" -how, EXACTLY, does that work? I want a detailed explanation at how anyone, much less EVERYONE, could "glance" at the rifle. Did they keep their eyes covered with their hands the whole time except for one quick peek? Did they run up to the rifle, and then stole a quick look at it as they turned to immediately run away?

    I know this sounds like I'm kidding, but I'm not. Anyone who thinks the cops "glanced" at it, I would pose the same question. If you came within an arms length of it and looked at it for more than a few seconds, it was not a glance. If you held it in your hands, you certainly did not glance at it.

    And one of the cops owned a sporting goods store, didn't he? It really doesn't matter, it just further underlines how unbelievable it all is. I don't care how much the profile of the Mannlicher looked like a Mauser from a distance. Anyone who could read would not mistake both the make AND the caliber.

    I have never once heard a convincing argument as to why I, or anyone, should honestly believe the cops in Dallas read the words "MADE ITALY" and thought to themselves "This rifle was made in Germany" and read "CAL 6.5" and thought to themselves "Cal 6.5 means 7.65." Especially someone who owned a store that sold rifles, but let's get real - these were all good ol' Texas boys in 1963. Each and every one of them was familiar with firearms.










    Leave a comment:


  • FISHY1118
    replied
    Originally posted by FrankO View Post
    If you're not willing or able to go into what's actually being written to you, then the more useful & convincing reply is always to not reply at all. Always.

    Have fun with your 'so much more'.
    Thanks franky for pointing that out , should be ''Tippet''

    Oh and btw , have you been paying attention to the 3875 post on this topic ?. Because if you had then you would see how willing ive been in my replys . Have fun ''tuning in'' .
    Last edited by FISHY1118; 03-25-2025, 08:23 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • FISHY1118
    replied
    Originally posted by FrankO View Post
    Unfortunately, she did nothing of the kind. She told that her husband's wounds were caused by one bullet and he couldn't be hit in both his upper body and wrist if he held his right hand at about shoulder level, which the Zapruder film shows he did until at least frame 279 and then again from frames 320 to 330.

    Why dont i just let Nellie Connally explain it to you [6 mins in ]


    If that isnt enough , just remember, your about to call this women a liar, who btw was in the limo on the most famous day of the most famous assassination of out time . Most likely even before you took your first breath on this planet!!! . Do you and herlock even realise how dumb , stupid and idiotic that looks ????
    ​Governor Connally's Story


    Leave a comment:


  • FrankO
    replied
    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

    Of course she did , so did Governor Connolly

    Not to mention the the Dr's at parkland hospital who exposed the fake autopsy photos of the back of jfks head.

    C399 , the Mauser rifle , the slug from Tifrom body , the Wallace recording, im afraid its to easy to expose the warren commission lie .

    There's so much more. I'll be posting it all.
    If you're not willing or able to go into what's actually being written to you, then the more useful & convincing reply is always to not reply at all. Always.

    Have fun with your 'so much more'.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X