JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

[FISHY1118]

What would the thread be like if we all did that Fishy? This is a forum for discussion. It’s impossible to read, assess and discuss 50 points at a time which is what we are getting.

I just can't believe for the life of me that today 62 years later , people such as yourself still believe Oswald fired 3 shots from the tsbd and killed the President ,acting totally alone .

With everything we now know ,all the different eyewitness, medical experts ,sworn testimony, etc,etc that Completely Contradicts the warren commission findings .

Never in my whole 60 on this planet , having had an interest in may crimes in all history , having studied the jfk assassination since I was 15, have I ever ever seen such a more deliberate case of a complete cover up lack of interest of the authorities of the day to find out the truth .


So you'll forgive me Herlock ,but if but if it takes discussing 50 points at the same time in the hope of doing so ,then so be it .

[Herlock Sholmes]

Of course they do . But well done for going against the medical expert doctors at parkland hospital who saw the back of jfks head the day he was shot. .

And the autopsy pathologists who disagreed?

And the HSCA pathologists who confirmed the WC.

And those used in other inquiries.

I can’t recall exactly but I believe, at the last count, it was 17 pathologists who all confirmed the results. No court in the world would dismiss that many experts.

What is likelier (even though I know what you’re committed to saying)

a - some of the doctors at Parkland - who were almost entirely juniors, who were trying to save the President’s life, who weren’t assessing wounds and weren’t qualified to do so anyway, who were young human beings in a traumatic situation, who commented on a wound to the back of Kennedy’s head which they couldn’t have seen because his head was on the table, who saw an area toward the rear of the head all matted with blood and hat and gore - were simply and honestly mistaken. Bugliosi asked Dr. Carrico, who was there, if it was possibly that they could have been mistaken and he said “absolutely.” So why do you say something can’t be possible when I guy who was actually there said that it was possible?

b - that three pathologists lied requiring faked x-rays in the hope that no one ever gave away their secret. And that one of those pathologists, completely of his own accord, called in a third pathologists to make up for the shortfall in knowledge of gunshot wounds.

You will undoubtedly say b. But a is clearly the reasonable position.

[GBinOz]

Why is it Herlock the bad guy as ever
I don't consider you to be the bad guy my friend. However I sometimes have difficulty in resisting what is known in Australia as "taking the mickey".

There was nothing intended as ‘deceptive’ in my post.
I wasn't referring to your post when I used the word deceptive.

I’ve said before that I didn’t want to get back into the case but failed miserably on that as here I am again. I’ll now re-double my efforts to leave it - especially as everything I seem to say annoys you so much George.
Your posts don't annoy me Herlock. But if I disagree I'll say so, which seems to annoy you. You have very strong viewpoints and, if you will forgive the suggestion, somewhat of a short fuse when it comes to theories that you have previously considered to be dismissed.

edit….reading your final line….maybe you’re right George. Frustration sets in. But I don’t think that we can get anywhere on small details though. That’s just my opinion. People have been squabbling over them for 60 years. One side will never convince the other I don’t think. Unless something new surfaces.

I think you have hit the nail on the head in that final paragraph.

[Herlock Sholmes]

If I choose to cut and paste herlock its because that is information I've sourced about the case that is relevant to the current discussion , where the problem ? If its to long for you the make yourself a coffee .

What would the thread be like if we all did that Fishy? This is a forum for discussion. It’s impossible to read, assess and discuss 50 points at a time which is what we are getting.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Of course you are , because it's was a Mauser they took from the TSBD .

What you call fake and forgery are indeed TRUTH and Facts.

Your everybody's lying, were idiots, were mistaken ,were non existant ridiculous argument has been battered to death, and were sick to death of it also.

You haven’t won a single point Fishy. Not one.

To be honest…you haven’t actually made any points of your own bat. You’ve just posted what conspiracy theorists have written online. But, as you’ve admitted in the past, you’ve only ever read conspiracy theorist work so you can’t be blamed for only seeing what you want to see; it’s simply confirmation bias. If you only read books telling you x you’re never going to listen when someone suggests y.

Nothing can be done about that of course.