Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FISHY1118
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    Nice cutting and pasting
    Nice more ''EVIDENCE'' THE W.C totally ignored , but hey why let the ''Truth'' get inthe way of a good story

    Leave a comment:


  • FISHY1118
    replied
    Originally posted by Fiver View Post

    Your source claimed that the APB for the JFK included a clothing description. Your source was lying.

    Your source claimed that all of the Tippit murder witnesses gave an identical a clothing description. Your source was lying.​

    Your source claimed that Oswald was just walking down the street before he ducked into the Texas Theater. Your source was lying.​​

    Your source claimed that Johnny Brewer was lying about hearing of Tippit's murder on the radio. Your source was lying.​​​

    Your source said that all the descriptions of Tippit's murderer contradicted each other. Your source was lying.

    Your source tried to pretend that Aquilla Clemons was at least three witnesses. Your source was lying.

    ​Your source said Domingo Benavides changed his testimony after his brother was murdered, Your source was lying.

    Your source said the murderer of Eddy Benavides was never caught, Your source was lying.​

    Your source lied about the distance between the location of Tippit's murder and the Texas Theater.

    Your source lied about the time between Tippit's murder and the time Oswald was seen entering the Texas Theater.

    Your source lied about Jack Ruby having a house in Oak Cliff.

    Your source lied about JD Tippit's reason for being in Oak Cliff.

    Your source lied about JD Tippit having a mistress in Oak Cliff.

    Your source lied about JD Tippet working for Jack Ruby.

    Your source lied about Billy Lovelady looking almost the same as Oswald.

    Your source lied about Lovelady being a smuggler and gunrunner.

    Your source lied about Jack Ruby being a successful gunrunner.

    Your source lied by claiming Ruth Paine got Lovelady a job at the TSBD.

    Your source lied about the occupation of Ruth Paine's father.

    Your source lied about Ruth Paine knowing Allen Dulles.

    Your source lied about Oswald's level of security clearance.

    That's not a complete list of your source's lies.​
    It your opinion that they lied !!!! , and of course your wrong , YOUR JUST GOING ROUND AND ROUND WITHOUT ANY PROOF . That the whole point of the discussion , CONTRADICTIONS AND INCONSISTANCIES OF THE W.C . YOUR MOCK TRIAL IS LOOKING SILLYIER BY THE DAY .

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

    Maybe you can ask him where in that quote did clint hill think the shots came from the front ?

    Why does he continualy fiddle and change to wording to divert to a whole different debate that moves away from the original discussion?

    Beats the hell outta me.
    Where has anyone even suggested that Clint Hill thought that the shots came from the front?

    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

    Of course, with the car accelerating away, he could have tippy toed across the trunk and "sautéd" into the back seat rather than clinging on in the best position achievable.
    "As the car accelerates, I wedge myself on top of the rear seat, trying to get my body above and behind Mrs. Kennedy and the president, to shield them from whatever shots might still be coming...​"

    ​Why would Clint Hill position himself "above and behind" "to shield them​" if he thought the shots were coming from the front?

    Leave a comment:


  • FISHY1118
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

    Of course, with the car accelerating away, he could have tippy toed across the trunk and "sautéd" into the back seat rather than clinging on in the best position achievable.
    Maybe you can ask him where in that quote did clint hill think the shots came from the front ?

    Why does he continualy fiddle and change to wording to divert to a whole different debate that moves away from the original discussion?

    Beats the hell outta me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X