JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

[GBinOz]

Hi Patrick

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=82#relPageId=1&tab=toc

Sections 39 and 41

Hey Iron Willpower, didn't you promise to never again darken the portals of this thread?

Carry on my friend.

[GBinOz]

That is definitely not what Dr Humes said.

"A. My problem is, very simply stated, we had an entrance wound high in the posterior back above the scapula. We didn't know where the exit wound was at that point. I'd be the first one to admit it. We knew in general in the past that we should have been more prescient than we were, I must confess, because when we removed the breast plate and examined the thoracic cavity, we saw a contusion on the upper lobe of the lung. There was no defect in the pleura anyplace. So it's obvious that the missile had gone over that top of the lung.
Of course, the more I thought about it, the more I realized it had to go out from the neck.

It was the only place it could go, after it was not found anywhere in the X-rays. So early the next morning, I called Parkland Hospital and talked with Malcolm Perry, I guess it was. And he said, Oh, yeah, there was a wound right in the middle of the neck by the tie, and we used that for the tracheotomy. Well, they obliterated, literally obliterated--when we went back to the photographs, we thought we might have seen some indication of the edge of that wound in the gaping skin where the--but it wouldn't make a great deal of sense to go slashing open the neck. What would we learn?"

Another deceptive post that fails to mention that the above is from Humes deposition to the ARRB in Feb 1996. At the time of the autopsy Hume probed the back wound and found it to be shallow, as confirmed by Finck, and was puzzled as to the lack of the presence of a projectile. After briefly considering an "ice" projectile, he postulated that the projectile must have fallen out as a result of the resuscitative measures utilised at Parkland. After speaking to Perry he burned his notes and rewrote the history of the autopsy to accommodate a neck wound instead of a back wound.

There is an interesting video (only 2 minutes long) of an interview with Arlen Specter who says that he based his SBT on drawings of the wounds, not photographs. His final quotation is very interesting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aS3zrdkoCdY&ab_channel=SCGATOR2001

[Herlock Sholmes]

Hi Herlock- the focus of my post wasn't McClelland it was the Appeals Document. It has morphed into McClelland. The request for All xrays and photos was in January of 1969. That is over 5 years later?. Where is the exhaustive analysis of the xrays and photos documented? Would love to see those explanations and expert analysis. I dont believe the WC has anything more than the Connally wrist?

Hi Patrick

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=82#relPageId=1&tab=toc

Sections 39 and 41

[Patrick Differ]

Hi Herlock- the focus of my post wasn't McClelland it was the Appeals Document. It has morphed into McClelland. The request for All xrays and photos was in January of 1969. That is over 5 years later?. Where is the exhaustive analysis of the xrays and photos documented? Would love to see those explanations and expert analysis. I dont believe the WC has anything more than the Connally wrist?

[Patrick Differ]

McClelland was there in the heat of the moment, surrounded by Secret Service, FBI and Mrs Kennedy trying to save a mortally wounded President. Mrs Kennedy told Clark that she knew he was dead. Of course he was, his head was blown off.

And getting to the truth of who and unfortunately how that happened only counts when some detail is obviously taken as some reason to no longer attempt to get at the truth. Wherever that leads. It would be like deciding that the First of Ten Commandments is wrong so why look at the next Nine?

So in the turmoil and in real time ( supported by Frame 313 ) it was actually the right temple and not the left. Oh sorry his head was in my hands. McClelland is obviously not a credible witness, eventhough he is an MD and was actually there.

Actually I found Dr Fromans testimony even more compelling as he gets into the Anatomical reasons why the single bullet theory was impossible. But that's in the next nine Commandments.

Anyway moving on I am surprised that the witness who was closest to Kennedy other than the Connallys and the Motorcycle Cop , Mrs Moorman, who took the Polaroid shots of Kennedy right after the head shot and is captured in the Zapruder film, is not mentioned or maybe I missed it. It wasn't the Badge Man controversy ( a candidate for A.I.) but rather the shots she heard and what she said.

Moorman said she heard one shot followed by a pause. Then she heard pow pow in succession. She then said there were other shots. Unfortunately Moorman sprained her ankle and had to reschedule her deposition. She NEVER heard from them again.