Jack the Ripper Writers

[Tom_Wescott]

You mean Joe "I've been cast out of every forum but Spiro's" Chetcuti? I wouldn't lose any sleep over it. Anyone of merit post there?

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

[Cap'n Jack]

Oh my gosh... I almost don't believe it, not only have the cowboys deleted my post, they also have allowed Joe to alter his original reply to my crucial point, and left the alteration undated as if it had always been there, just to cast them and 'im in a better light.
This is some range these boys ride.

[Cap'n Jack]

Well Tom, stepping on a goose is probably easier than cooking one.

[Tom_Wescott]

Uh oh, has Spiro gone the way of HB and become the powermad post-deleting fuhrer of his land? It's all downhill from here.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

[Cap'n Jack]

Hey Spiro, are you in danger of autospiralling out of control or what?
Removing my legitimate post was a shade on the tacky side nicht?
Did I expose a raw nerve?
Or were you just feeling a bit nervous?

[auspirograph]

The exciting conclusion to...

...on the last day of the merry month of May, Jack the Ripper Writers presents the final episode to the 'author's cut' of Joe Chetcuti's groundbreaking article, Tumblety - Identifying the Source. With thanks to the folks at Ripperologist where the previous version had first appeared.

Part 4 can be read here:

http://ripperwriters.aforumfree.com/Tumblety-Identifying-the-Source-Pt-4-h5.htm

[auspirograph]

For the folks on Casebook and visitors to the Jack the Ripper Writers site, we continue the exciting serialised article Tumblety - Identying the Source with Part 3 by Joe Chetcuti.

In case anyone who may have missed the previous parts , here is the link to those and to the new section:

http://ripperwriters.aforumfree.com/a-writer-s-showcase-f9/ripper-writing-t33.htm

[auspirograph]

...and Part 2 of Tumbelty - Identifying the Source by Joe Chetcuti can now be read here:

http://ripperwriters.aforumfree.com/Tumbelty-Identifying-the-Source-Pt-2-h3.htm

Enjoy!

[auspirograph]

'Ripper Writers' Presents...

During the merry month of May, Jack the Ripper Writers will be hosting an exciting new serialised article by Joe Chetcuti as a way of contributing something back to the online Ripper community.

Although the article has appeared in Ripperologist, this version is an exclusive to Jack the Ripper Writers being the 'author's cut', that is the version of the article as it was intended by its author before it was run through the editorial filters of Ripperologist.

Mr. Chetcuti said that he, "is happy to share his article "Identifying the Source" with the Jack the Ripper Writers web site. The article is presented in the version that is most preferred by the author."

The featured article, to appear as a four-part special, for the first time identifies the London correspondant who fed America with news of the alleged complicity in the Whitechapel murders of the suspect, Francis Tumbelty.

Be sure to not miss it and stay tuned for the next exciting episodes of Tumbelty - Identifying the Source made available for the interest and enjoyment of visitors to Jack the Ripper Writers.

Part 1 can be read here:

http://ripperwriters.aforumfree.com/Tumbelty-Identifying-the-Source-Pt-1-h2.htm

A section has also been made available for readers of the article to make comments as desired here:

http://ripperwriters.aforumfree.com/a-writer-s-showcase-f9/comments-critics-t80.htm

Thanks to Mr. Chetcuti for generously making this ground-breaking piece of research and competant writing available to visitors of 'Ripper Writers'.

[auspirograph]

Happy Birthday 'Ripper Writers'.

Jack the Ripper Writers has turned one!

Thank you to all who have shown support for an online study and research group focused exclusively on the Whitechapel murders and for your valued and active participation.

As initial invitations have now gone out, writers and crime historians on the subject are welcome, if interested, to register.

Thanks

[auspirograph]

Thanks Caz, point(s) taken, have a great day...

[caz]

Fair enough, Spiro.

In future, I suggest you don't start the off-topic ball rolling by mentioning the M word yourself.

But you are right - Powell's work should not be discussed on a thread entitled 'Jack the Ripper Writers'.

As you were...

Love,

Caz
X

[auspirograph]

Ripper Writers - Update

For those of Casebook who are members or anyone who may be interested in participating on a small but friendly site for writers on the Whitechapel murders, the home page has now been restored. Thanks for your patience whilst sorting out this technical issue.

To Caz and Victoria, please take your off-topic squabble to the thread indended for it, I hear there's a great pub around the corner serving refreshments and lively debate on Steve Powell's impending Maybrick commentaries.

To make it easy for you, here is the link:

http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=32&page=59

The next wildly off-topic post that flagrantly ignores Casebook's modest guidelines, Leaves me no option but to report the person to the site's administrator. I trust you'll respect that and your fellow members of Casebook with your mature co-operation.

Thanks

[Victoria]

Caz,
I can't be that 'thinking' .. because I don't get the importance of what
Feldman researching his favourite suspect has to do with him 'hearing'
of a diary emerging.
I do not know anything about Feldman, that was after my 'time'.
I endorse Steve on the early parts of the story, because of what
I remember. I trust him on the rest, as I know him to be an honest
and good person.
I do not know about everything that will be in the book .. we should
wait, and see when it comes out .. before being condemnatory.
That seems fair to me.

Victoria

[caz]

Ah yes. Feldy is conveniently dead, isn't he, so Powell thinks he can say whatever he likes about when and how the man became involved. Did you not know that Feldman was researching his favourite suspect, Monty Druitt, when he first heard that a diary had emerged?

Victoria, you come across as a thinking, caring woman, and yet you can endorse Powell's utter crap.

Shame on you.

Caz