Major achievement. Best of luck with the book, Fisherman. Look forward to seeing it on the shelves.
Cutting Point
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by GUT View Post
Yep your book may persuade me, I will read with an open mind.
In the end, all one can hope for is what you put on offer: an open mind. And if you can make a case good enough for the ones with an open mind to pause and ask themselves "that really isn´t a bad theory, is it?", then you have achieved a lot.
Stay well, Gut!
Comment
-
-
Has Ed Stow abandoned his book Fish now that you've beaten him to it or is he still working on one?Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostHas Ed Stow abandoned his book Fish now that you've beaten him to it or is he still working on one?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
That´s not for me to say. However, Edward has an immense lot of material to bring to the table, and let me tell you, Herlock - you don´t want to miss out on that! Ideally, he can put a book out there when the interest for the carman has peaked.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Don't forget, I'm the one who encouraged you to push the victimology up a bit to Chapman. Beyond that, it's pretty dicey. So now you can join Lynn Cates as the "two-off" guys in Ripperology, for victims Nichols and Chapman, suspects Lechmere and Issenschmid. Both very good theories.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott Nelson View PostDon't forget, I'm the one who encouraged you to push the victimology up a bit to Chapman. Beyond that, it's pretty dicey. So now you can join Lynn Cates as the "two-off" guys in Ripperology, for victims Nichols and Chapman, suspects Lechmere and Issenschmid. Both very good theories.
Or was that a rhino ...??
Comment
-
Hi that’s really good news. Enjoyed the documentary watched it a few times now and found it really interesting.
The only two critical points on the documentary are
1 the leap of faith required to accept Letcmere may have stayed at his mothers one particular night
and
2 The summing up by the prosecutor/ lawyer at the end when he announced a case to answer.
I often wonder if he had said no case to answer would it have been cut out.
I disagree with his assumption I don’t think there is enough to “ take the case to court”.
Minor thought but you come across as a really good guy and I for one am looking forward to your book.
Good luck and you must feel very proud of your achievements
regards.
Comment
Comment