An even closer look at Black Bag Man

[New Waterloo]

Thank you George for the map. I wrongly assumed that the numbering on Christian Street ran lower and rising from the Commercial Road end. Where 22 is on your map clearly shows his route home was sensible and understandable. Sorry all.
the route is interesting in that I guess he must have walked by some main characters on his way. Thanks for clearing that up George. Got to get my brain engaged again!

NW

[NotBlamedForNothing]

you’re trying to make sense of something that did not happen.

Mortimer did not see the man in the court, in Dutfield’s yard. Dew’s description is wrong.

Off course he is wrong. I'm simply wondering if two women had similar stories which have been conflated.

[NotBlamedForNothing]

Faulty memory and a reliance on a small stash of newspaper reports from the time. Initially, it was believed that Stride was murdered earlier than 1am and that Mortimer's Black Bag Man was her likely killer. Moreover, since Chapman there rose a train of thought that the Whitechapel murderer was a medical man (i.e. black bag). Police confusing characters from the case years later is rampant and, perhaps, to be expected. IIRC Dew confused Paul and Cross, and Macnaghten appears to put three Jews in Berner Street (instead of Mitre Square) and makes PC Smith a City PC witness (which he excises in his second draft). In fact, you see it all the time on Casebook posts. It's easy to confuse John Davis with John Richardson or Wynne Baxter with Bagster Phillips if you haven't thought about the case in some years to any depth. It's no different for men writing in the 20th century about something that occupied their time only briefly in the century prior.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

Can we be sure that that was all Dew was relying on? What about police documents like witness statements?

Thanks again.

[NotBlamedForNothing]

Thank you George for the map. I wrongly assumed that the numbering on Christian Street ran lower and rising from the Commercial Road end. Where 22 is on your map clearly shows his route home was sensible and understandable. Sorry all.
the route is interesting in that I guess he must have walked by some main characters on his way. Thanks for clearing that up George. Got to get my brain engaged again!

NW

Goldstein's route from along Commercial Rd and ultimately down to 22 Christian is arguably the same route taken by Israel Schwartz, who ran to a railway arch. Goldstein lived a stone's throw from a railway arch.

In the Star report of "the Hungarian" ...

... he crossed to the other side of the street. Before he had gone many yards, however, he heard the sound of a quarrel, and turned back to learn what was the matter, ...

According to Fanny Mortimer ...

... the only man whom I had seen pass through the street previously was a young man carrying a black shiny bag who walked very fast down the street from the Commercial road. He looked up at the club, and then went round the corner by the board school.

Uncannily similar.

[NotBlamedForNothing]

The TL;DR for post #1 is:

Does it make sense for Fanny to say, "I didn't pay particular attention to him"? To me, that sounds like someone who is in a position to observe the man at some length (but chose not to), and from some distance. Fanny Mortimer was not in a position to do either of those things. However, a woman who lived on the opposite side of the street and further toward Commercial Rd, would have been in a position to do both.

I see three possible responses:

1. Fanny didn't say that - the journalist got that wrong too.

2. Fanny did say that about a man who walked right by her as she stood at her doorstep.

3. Another woman said this, who saw the man at a greater distance and over a longer time span.


Which of these or otherwise was what happened?

[Kattrup]

Off course he is wrong. I'm simply wondering if two women had similar stories which have been conflated.

Well, you quoted Dew’s description and then asked “Would it make more sense to suppose this occurred out on the street?”

So my point was that you’re using a description from forty years after the fact, a description of an incident that we know did not occur, and you’re trying to take elements of it (the man turning his head or whatever) and fitting them to other sources that you’re wondering about. That is not possible.
Wondering about whether F Mortimer and the neighbor are the same is another matter.

I think they are, the only inconsistency is the neighbor saying the man she saw might have come from the club, whereas Mortimer says he came from Commercial street and just looked at the club.

I also think your reading of “up” and “down” is too literal. People use such terms interchangeably, you think up means north and down south - we don’t know that.
People might say up about someone coming towards them and down about people moving away, for instance, disirregardles of compassial directions.

[Kattrup]

The TL;DR for post #1 is:



I see three possible responses:

1. Fanny didn't say that - the journalist got that wrong too.

2. Fanny did say that about a man who walked right by her as she stood at her doorstep.

3. Another woman said this, who saw the man at a greater distance and over a longer time span.


Which of these or otherwise was what happened?

#2, except it’s not clear that he walked “right by her”, he may have walked on the opposite side of the street.
Fanny M said the man she saw looked up at the club, so perhaps he was not on the same side as the club.

[NotBlamedForNothing]

Well, you quoted Dew’s description and then asked “Would it make more sense to suppose this occurred out on the street?”

So my point was that you’re using a description from forty years after the fact, a description of an incident that we know did not occur, and you’re trying to take elements of it (the man turning his head or whatever) and fitting them to other sources that you’re wondering about. That is not possible.

I should have left Dew out of it. LOL

We can read Dew as placing Mortimer in Dutfield's Yard, but Dew implicitly has black bag man killing Stride while Mortimer is at her 'gate'. How does that work without her seeing Stride? That is why I suppose that "opposite the court" means "across the road from the gateway". I could be 100% wrong.

Wondering about whether F Mortimer and the neighbor are the same is another matter.

I think they are, the only inconsistency is the neighbor saying the man she saw might have come from the club, whereas Mortimer says he came from Commercial street and just looked at the club.

Not the only inconsistency, as discussed in #1. Also, GBinOz has argued that the neighbour's appearance - "apparently the wife of a well-to-do artisan" - is not a good fit for Fanny Mortimer.

I also think your reading of “up” and “down” is too literal. People use such terms interchangeably, you think up means north and down south - we don’t know that.
People might say up about someone coming towards them and down about people moving away, for instance, disirregardles of compassial directions.

This up/down issue has been discussed several times in the past. Witness statements seem to consistently refer to the Commercial Rd end as 'up', and the southern end as 'down'. I believe the street has a slight gradient, consistent with this.

[NotBlamedForNothing]

#2, except it’s not clear that he walked “right by her”, he may have walked on the opposite side of the street.
Fanny M said the man she saw looked up at the club, so perhaps he was not on the same side as the club.

If #2 is correct, then let's get the full context (again):

No, I didn't pay particular attention to him. He was respectably dressed, but was a stranger to me. He might ha' been coming from the Socialist Club., A good many young men goes there, of a Saturday night especially.

That man is walking north. This cannot easily be explained away.

If a man walking north had done so on the East/opposite side only, it could not reasonably be supposed that he might have been coming from the club, which would require him to walk in an almost right-angled manner on leaving the yard. Why would he do that if not to avoid eye contact? Or as Dew said, "His head was turned away, as though he did not wish to be seen."

[GBinOz]

I also think your reading of “up” and “down” is too literal. People use such terms interchangeably, you think up means north and down south - we don’t know that.

Hi Kattrup,

Another possibility is that many people who don't think in terms of geographic directions, such as north and south, might describe "up" as - in the direction of an upward grade in the street, and down as the opposite. Berner St sloped up to the north, towards Commercial Rd, and down to the south, towards Fairclough St.

Cheers, George

[Kattrup]

Hi Kattrup,

Another possibility is that many people who don't think in terms of geographic directions, such as north and south, might describe "up" as - in the direction of an upward grade in the street, and down as the opposite. Berner St sloped up to the north, towards Commercial Rd, and down to the south, towards Fairclough St.

Cheers, George

Absolutely a possibility

[Tom_Wescott]

Can we be sure that that was all Dew was relying on? What about police documents like witness statements?

Thanks again.

It's obvious from the text. Also, memoirs at the time (and perhaps now) were primarily written from memory. Usually selective.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

[New Waterloo]

Leon Goldstein is an interesting character and I have noticed there are some strange coincidences (I am sure they have been noticed before) Goldstein is said to live at 22 Christian Street. I believe Schwartz lived at 22 Ellen Street. In fact I think the number 22 comes up on another street in the area. Goldstein follows the same route (either before or after) taken by Schwarz.

The famous graffiti and apron are found in Goulston Street. I think there are a couple of reports where the address is stated at Goldstein Street.

If the writer (which has been suggested) has poor writing skills or language difficulties does he think the street is called Goldstein. Is he telling is something.

Are these somehow clues.

Am I mistaken (I cant find the report) that the press found Schwarz a few days later in Spectacle alley (I think I might be wrong on that one)

Again something not right here

NW

[NotBlamedForNothing]

Leon Goldstein is an interesting character and I have noticed there are some strange coincidences (I am sure they have been noticed before) Goldstein is said to live at 22 Christian Street. I believe Schwartz lived at 22 Ellen Street. In fact I think the number 22 comes up on another street in the area. Goldstein follows the same route (either before or after) taken by Schwarz.

Might that same route and strange coincidences suggest that we are dealing with one man, not two?

According to C-I Swanson's report to the Home Office:

12.45 a.m. 30th. Israel Schwartz of 22 Helen [sic - Ellen] Street, Backchurch Lane, stated that at this hour, on turning into Berner St. from Commercial Road...

We don't know if that was the address Schwartz moved to or from, or even if the moving took place. As Swanson says nothing of any move, we should probably suppose that was Schwartz's address when he went to the police (apparently on the evening of the day of the murder).

The famous graffiti and apron are found in Goulston Street. I think there are a couple of reports where the address is stated at Goldstein Street.

If the writer (which has been suggested) has poor writing skills or language difficulties does he think the street is called Goldstein. Is he telling is something.

Are these somehow clues.

Example. It's just a coincidence, albeit a slightly amusing one.

Am I mistaken (I cant find the report) that the press found Schwarz a few days later in Spectacle alley (I think I might be wrong on that one)

Again something not right here

NW

Goldstein claimed to have come from a cafe in Spectacle alley, just prior to being seen in Berner St. A journalist from the Star newspaper claimed to have "ran him to earth in Backchurch-lane" - him being "the Hungarian" Schwartz.

[NotBlamedForNothing]

Albert Bachert is certainly as "a person of interest." It has always seemed suspicious to me that he inserted himself into the case at so many different points, and as we know that's something that serial killers do. He certainly had a big view of himself and could be classed at the least as something of a trouble maker. This is what makes his sudden disappearance curious because, much like Roslyn D'Onston, he was a self-advertiser who was often in the news.

From the Echo, Oct 2:

"MAN WITH A BLACK SHINY BAG."

The young man Albert Baskert, of [13], Newnham-street, Whitechapel, has made a further statement. It will be noticed that the man who spoke to him in the Three Nuns Hotel on Saturday night carried a black shiny bag, and it is remarkable that the only man Mrs. Mortimer observed in Berner-street, nearly two hours afterwards, also carried a black shiny bag. Baskert says: - "On Saturday night, about seven minutes to twelve, I entered the Three Nuns Hotel, Aldgate. While in there an elderly woman, very shabbily dressed, came in and asked me to buy some matches. I refused, and she went out. A man who had been standing by me remarked that these persons were a nuisance, to which I responded 'Yes.' He then asked me to have a glass with him, but I refused, as I had just called for one myself. He then asked me if I knew how old some of the women who were in the habit of soliciting outside. I replied that I thought some who looked about 25 were over 35, the reason they looked younger being on account of the powder and paint. He asked if I could tell him where they usually went with men, and I replied that I had heard that some went to places in Oxford-street, Whitechapel, others to some houses in Whitechapel-road, and others to Bishopsgate-street. He then asked whether I thought they would go with him down Northumberland-alley, a dark, lonely court in Fenchurch-street. I said I did not know, but supposed they would. He then went outside and spoke to the woman who was selling the matches, and gave her something, I believe. He returned to me, and I bade him "Good night" at about ten minutes past twelve. I believe the woman was waiting for him. I do not think I could identify the woman, as I did not take particular notice of her, but I should know the man again. He was a dark man, about 38 years of age, height about 5ft. 6in. or 7in. He wore a black felt hat, dark clothes (morning coat), and black tie, and carried a black, shiny bag.