Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes
View Post
Discussing and disputing details and evidence that supports this is futile ,just look at where we're at, approaching 5000 post on the subject and were still no closer to a definitive t.o.d one way or the other .
Your use of the evidence and the way you have interpreted it is different to mine and others . That doesn't mean your correct with your assumptions, the fact remains and always will that the evidence in this case is uncertain, contradicts itself, ambiguous and unreliable as to determine any accuracy with a t.o. d for Annie'Chapman.
Its shear madness to go over and over the same information post after post back and forth just for arguments sake ,which is definitely going on here im afraid .
Comment