Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

John Richardson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

    Good to see im in the First CLass


    Ive got the Popcorn and Beer on standby while i await your reply to Georges post below , you know this one where i said exactly the same thing and you went nuts over ?


    ''Phillips - I don't know that any doctor would admit that his methods were unreliable. That's a modern day assessment, but strangely, other ToD's were surprisingly accurate, relatively speaking. I know the common answer to this suggestion is that the others cribbed their ToD's by finding out the answer first, but I see no evidence that the doctor's interrogated beat cops or witnesses before they produced their ToD's so as to ensure they got the right answer.''
    I’m glad that you feel that hypocrisy is ok.
    Regards

    Sir Herlock Sholmes.

    “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

    Comment


    • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

      Ok now i got it, why didnt you just say that ,. in your JTR world, everything is a possibility or might have been , and could have been , probably was, highly likely , highly unlikely ? etc , etc . Based on the evidence of course .

      Dont look now bit were all in that world . [just my sarcasm playing up ]
      I did “just say that.” I’ve just posted where I did “just say that.”
      Regards

      Sir Herlock Sholmes.

      “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

      Comment


      • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

        Not sure your following the conversation here Herlock , the noise that Cadosch heard that hit the fence cant be proven or just assumed to have been Chapman or her killer ! no matter which way you slice or dice it . There are too many other factors at play here when you take all the evidence into consideration.

        What ever the noise was that cadosch heard, [ remembering his words 'something' ,not ''someone'' ] the body imo was already there long befor that incident occured.

        If youve being paying attention regarding what might have made the ''noise '', George has made several post as have i already which you have dismissed previously . Now like all things regarding peoples personnal opinions, you dont have to agree with them, that doesnt mean your theory is any more correct Especially when it no more provable , which it is not .
        The point is that it can’t have been anything else.

        Why aren’t you understanding this Fishy!?
        Regards

        Sir Herlock Sholmes.

        “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

          I’m glad that you feel that hypocrisy is ok.
          I feel it most times you post .
          'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

          Comment


          • If there was no earlier estimation from Phillips not one of you would be questioning Richardson or Cadosch.
            Regards

            Sir Herlock Sholmes.

            “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

              The point is that it can’t have been anything else. Why aren’t you understanding this Fishy!?
              What s there to understand, the Noise wasnt Necessarily ​the body.
              'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                If there was no earlier estimation from Phillips not one of you would be questioning Richardson or Cadosch.
                What would we be left with without witnesses ? , only a Doctors estimated t.o.d , just like Brown and Baxters t.o d ,we know how accurate they were dont we ?
                'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                Comment


                • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

                  What s there to understand, the Noise wasnt Necessarily ​the body.
                  Then what ‘could’ it have been?
                  Regards

                  Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                  “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

                    What would we be left with without witnesses ? , only a Doctors estimated t.o.d , just like Brown and Baxters t.o d ,we know how accurate they were dont we ?
                    Regards

                    Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                    “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

                      What s there to understand, the Noise wasnt Necessarily ​the body.
                      True... it may have been a cricket ball...

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

                        Your constant espousal of this ‘all clicks were accurate and synchronised’ is just infantile.​
                        You're charging 'round the threads being antagonistic and aggressive again, Herlock.

                        'Not a good look.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by A P Tomlinson View Post

                          True... it may have been a cricket ball...
                          Or it may have been something else , but ill tell what you and anyone else cant prove ...... That was it was Annie Chapman or her killer , nice try at the sarcasm tho .
                          'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Fleetwood Mac View Post

                            You're charging 'round the threads being antagonistic and aggressive again, Herlock.

                            'Not a good look.
                            How do you see aggression in anything that I’ve posted? I’m simply responding to multiple posts. I’m never aggressive.
                            Regards

                            Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                            “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

                              Or it may have been something else , but ill tell what you and anyone else cant prove ...... That was it was Annie Chapman or her killer , nice try at the sarcasm tho .
                              Then name something that it could have been.
                              Regards

                              Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                              “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

                                I feel it most times you post .
                                But the person insult came from you, not me. As long as we’re clear on that.
                                Regards

                                Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                                “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X