Jack McCarthy speech on Dorset Street

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scott Nelson
    Superintendent
    • Feb 2008
    • 2401

    #31
    Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
    Why stop at 2? There could have been 3,4,5…
    There were three McCarthy families there in 1891. Any one of which could have had a relative, a cousin, etc., collecting rents there in 1888.

    Comment

    • Scott Nelson
      Superintendent
      • Feb 2008
      • 2401

      #32
      We have the John McCarthy, aged 42, occupation - General Shop Keeper (shop = chandler's ?). Was he the rent collector in 1888?

      Comment

      • MrBarnett
        *
        • Nov 2013
        • 5672

        #33
        Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post
        We have the John McCarthy, aged 42, occupation - General Shop Keeper (shop = chandler's ?). Was he the rent collector in 1888?


        The rent collector was Thomas Bowyer. MJK’s landlord was Bowyer’s ‘governor’, a grocer who was awarded a prize for collecting for charity. He had been born in Dieppe and was living at 27, Dorset Street in 1881 and was still there in 1901.





        Comment

        • Scott Nelson
          Superintendent
          • Feb 2008
          • 2401

          #34
          I'm not talking about Bowyer. I'm talking about the guy in the 1891 census at #27 Dorest St. , John McCarthy, aged 42, General Shop Keeper, born Spitalfields.

          Comment

          • MrBarnett
            *
            • Nov 2013
            • 5672

            #35
            Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post
            I'm not talking about Bowyer. I'm talking about the guy in the 1891 census at #27 Dorest St. , John McCarthy, aged 42, General Shop Keeper, born Spitalfields.
            I know.

            But I’m talking about the man who was Bowyer’s employer. Bowyer described himself as his ‘servant’. The press referred to him as a landlord and a grocer, a man who was awarded prizes for his charitable work - the man you describe as a mere ‘rent collector’.

            We’ve all spotted the other JM on the 1891 census. Was he there in 1888?

            Comment

            • Scott Nelson
              Superintendent
              • Feb 2008
              • 2401

              #36
              Without a land tax record it would be difficult to say. Oh wait! He didn't own the property, did he?

              Comment

              • MrBarnett
                *
                • Nov 2013
                • 5672

                #37
                Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post
                Without a land tax record it would be difficult to say. Oh wait! He didn't own the property, did he?
                He didn’t need to to be a landlord.

                Comment

                • Scott Nelson
                  Superintendent
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 2401

                  #38
                  And a landlord he was. A rent collector.

                  Comment

                  • MrBarnett
                    *
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 5672

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post
                    And a landlord he was. A rent collector.
                    As was the JM who attended Abberline’s retirement do.

                    At last!

                    Comment

                    • Scott Nelson
                      Superintendent
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 2401

                      #40
                      No, somehow I have the feeling the McCarthy at Abberline's retirement didn't actually collect the rents. He had others do that.

                      Comment

                      • Scott Nelson
                        Superintendent
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 2401

                        #41
                        ...so why don't you just let me have the last word on this. Everyone is sick of the bullshit.

                        Comment

                        • MrBarnett
                          *
                          • Nov 2013
                          • 5672

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post
                          ...so why don't you just let me have the last word on this. Everyone is sick of the bullshit.
                          You raised it in the first place. Now you call it bullshit and want the last word?

                          Be my guest.

                          Comment

                          • MrBarnett
                            *
                            • Nov 2013
                            • 5672

                            #43
                            Just before I go…

                            When I get a better copy of the press photo of JM Esq., I reserve the right to post it alongside the sketch of MJK’s landlord to see if there’s any resemblance. Of course, if there is, Scott will no doubt claim that all McCarthies look alike.

                            Take it away, Scotty…

                            Comment

                            • Varqm
                              Inspector
                              • Feb 2008
                              • 1130

                              #44
                              Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post

                              I don’t follow, V. The genealogy is fairly straightforward: the French-born JM was the father of the music hall performer, Steve. They were both involved in the boxing world. Does that tie in with your understanding of things?


                              The newspaper ad I saw was in around 1898.We'll Steve must be John then.
                              Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced,it started civil society).
                              M. Pacana

                              Comment

                              • DJA
                                *
                                • May 2015
                                • 4700

                                #45
                                Yep.
                                Born 1874.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X