Originally posted by Ben
View Post
"...Blend some meat and bread with gastric juice; put them in a tiny bottle, and place that bottle in a sand-bath, exposed to a slow heat of ninety eight degrees, now and then vigorously agitating the contents to copy the stomach’s actions; you will discover, following 6-8 hours, the entire contents mixed into a single pultaceous mass. If I put in a glass of light beer or a measure of alcohol, to another phial containing gastric juice and food, dealt with in an identical way, after 7-8 hours, or perhaps a few days, the food hardly is acted upon in any way."
I said the effect is miniscule, minor, of no major significance, your own article which points out a very simplistic example replaces a 6-8 hr time frame with 7-8 hrs.
How on earth can you claim this is of any significance, and certainly does not help your claim in any way.
Kelly ate fish & potato's approximately 1-1.5 hrs before her death, the food had only partially begun to be digested.
If she had not gone out to find food at this time, and not even left her room since entering with Blotchy then you need to tripple this digestive time period from 1-1.5 hrs to an unbelievable 3.5 hrs.
How does your article allow for such a prolonged delay?, it doesn't because it cannot, what I explained to you is correct, the effect is very small.
Alcohol is absorbed into the body too quickly to help digest a meal. The example given makes no allowance for absorbtion into the human body (it takes place in a bottle) because the alcohol has no other tissue to absorb itself into except the food it is added to.
The whole article is intended to demonstrate that liquor does not aid digestion, not that alcohol remains in the body to slow down digestion, which is what your argument requires.
Regards, Jon S.
Comment