Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A photograph of Joseph Lawende in 1899
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
omg. what are you talking about?
Are you referring to my last sentence?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post
I was ridiculed for saying that it was generally obvious in Whitechapel in 1888 who was Jewish and who was not.
That wedding photograph illustrates my point.
It would have been obvious to both Schwarz and Lawende whether the man they were describing was a gentile or a Jew.
It is therefore inconceivable that either of them would suddenly have realised that their suspect was a Jew upon seeing him in the Seaside Home.
Leave a comment:
-
How does Lawende look ‘Jewish’ in that photograph. He looks like an English gentleman to me.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostEarlier this year I was delighted to receive from a descendant of Joseph Lawende a copy of a group photograph taken at the wedding of his daughter Rose to Isidore Goodman Samuel in 1899. Joseph can be seen on the right at the back, standing next to his wife Annie. The bridesmaid sitting in the centre at the front is Joseph's youngest daughter Ruby. I am most grateful to the owner of the photograph for permission to reproduce it here.
[ATTACH]9967[/ATTACH]
I was ridiculed for saying that it was generally obvious in Whitechapel in 1888 who was Jewish and who was not.
That wedding photograph illustrates my point.
It would have been obvious to both Schwarz and Lawende whether the man they were describing was a gentile or a Jew.
It is therefore inconceivable that either of them would suddenly have realised that their suspect was a Jew upon seeing him in the Seaside Home.Last edited by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1; 11-10-2022, 10:08 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by YankeeSergeant View PostIf I remember correctly any movement would blur the photograph. I know when I and my wife had a glass plate photo done a few years back that it required five-10 minutes. And again, being a formal photograph I don't know that smiling was encouraged by the photographer.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes just like people used to keep the corpses at home untill the funerals, which is today almost not allowed I think, or just like open-casket funerals, today we find it very morbid, but it used to be the standard. Yes I'm wondering how the people would have looked if they were smiling and showing their teeth back then, what an official portrait that would have been!
Leave a comment:
-
Just thinking that there were two others with Lawende, and coincidentally, there are 3 men in the picture.
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
Photos
Originally posted by Sister Hyde View PostI don't think people smiled on pictures ever. and it was not only due the fact that they had to stand still for 10 minutes or so, but also because back then a picture was a serious portrait, like an official representation of the persons, far from the happy little memories pictures we take on our trips around the world to show how happy we are nowadays
Leave a comment:
-
The only known man to have seen the Ripper (well, IMO ). And only, what, eleven (?) years after the sighting itself? Wow.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't think people smiled on pictures ever. and it was not only due the fact that they had to stand still for 10 minutes or so, but also because back then a picture was a serious portrait, like an official representation of the persons, far from the happy little memories pictures we take on our trips around the world to show how happy we are nowadays
Leave a comment:
-
Height
Originally posted by KatBradshaw View PostDo we have any info on his height etc? They all seems so small!
Leave a comment:
-
miles of smiles
Originally posted by Robert View PostI suppose with those old cameras, it was a bit difficult to hold a smile for the required length of time.
It seems to have been a spring wedding - plenty of blossom.
Leave a comment:
-
Do we have any info on his height etc? They all seems so small!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: