Originally posted by GBinOz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Did JtR change his MO after murdering Martha Tabram
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
I have just read your previous post and ask when are researchers going to stop relying on newspaper reports they are unsafe how mnay more times do people have to be told
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Since most official records have been lost, upon which resource should we be relying?
Cheers, GeorgeThe needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
Comment
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
Hi Trevor,
Since most official records have been lost, upon which resource should we be relying?
Cheers, George
When perusing newspaper articles we see so many conflciting articles on the respective topics, and we then see researchers cherry picking a particular article or a part of an arcticle to suit their theory.
The only reliable sources in my opinion are the signed inquest depositions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Not newspapers as primary source materials.
When perusing newspaper articles we see so many conflciting articles on the respective topics, and we then see researchers cherry picking a particular article or a part of an arcticle to suit their theory.
The only reliable sources in my opinion are the signed inquest depositions.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
So your book contains no information derived from newspapers?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
My book covers all aspects of the Ripper murders and does include newspaper reports but I draw no conclusions from their inclusion and I certainly do not cherry pick the reports to suit my own personal beliefs.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
It sounds as though you are saying you include unsafe material that doesn’t suit your own ideas. How odd.
Comment
-
Trevor,
This appears on your website to support your contention that no organs were removed by the killer.
It’s a newspaper report. It supports your ‘own personal beliefs’. And you use it to contradict Coroner Baxter.
Presumably it isn’t in your book because that would go against your principles.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View PostTrevor,
This appears on your website to support your contention that no organs were removed by the killer.
It’s a newspaper report. It supports your ‘own personal beliefs’. And you use it to contradict Coroner Baxter.
Presumably it isn’t in your book because that would go against your principles.
and for the record i have always postulated that newspapers articles are unsafe unless there is specific corroboration, which in the case of this article there clearly is and clear evidence that there was a lucrative trade in legal and illegal organs from mortuaries in 1888.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View PostOf course, what the ‘mysterious American’ was said to have asked for was a number of uteri, preserved in glycerine instead of the usual alcohol, and ‘sent to America direct’.
The Pall Mall Gazette’s comparison was an invalid one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post... preserved in glycerine instead of the usual alcohol...
M.(Image of Charles Allen Lechmere is by artist Ashton Guilbeaux. Used by permission. Original art-work for sale.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
Perhaps you can point us in the direction of the specific corroboration of the prices quoted by the PMG. And let us in on the reason why you chose to use a newspaper report of a newspaper report rather than the more reliable source you discovered.
Its all in the revised edition of my book seek and ye shall find.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
How do you know what Baxter said? Are you sure he didn’t say 20s rather than £20?
Comment
Comment