Originally posted by Joshua Rogan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oh, murder!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View PostThanks Joshua
Ive always thought that the cat waking her was because it either was disturbed by the killer entering her room, or perhaps, she had the timing off a bit and the cat was agitated by the smell of blood.
Ive had cats and they get agitated (hungry?)when they smell blood.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Joshua Rogan View PostDaily News 13th Nov 1888;
"Perhaps the most sensational bit of evidence tendered was that of a garrulous young woman who, with some dramatic force, imitated by voice and action a sort of nightmare cry of "Oh! murder!" which she declared she had heard just after she had been woke up by her kitten rubbing its nose against her face about half-past three or four o'clock on the morning of the murder. It was a faintish cry, she said, as though somebody had woke up with the nightmare, and though the evidence must be taken with the reserve that should attach to all such testimony, the time at which she believes she heard the cry would tally very well with all the circumstances of the case, and it is not impossible that that really was the death gasp of the poor woman in the clutches of her murderer."
Elizabeth Prater's evidence, Echo 12th Nov 1888;
"What was the next thing? - A black kitten, of which I am very fond, came to my bed, and rubbed itself against my face.
It disturbed you? - Yes, it tried to get into the bed, and awoke me. That must have been about half-past four, as I heard the clock chiming. I pushed the kitten away.
Yes? - And, just as I pushed the kitten away I heard, "Oh! Murder!" It was as if it was a nightmare. It was just "Oh! Oh! (in a faint, gasping way) - Murder!"
Where did the sound seem to come from? - Up the court, somewhere. I did not hear it a second time. I did not take any notice of it. Then I went to sleep.
You did not hear any singing? - None whatever. If there had been any at half-past one I should have heard it."
Ive always thought that the cat waking her was because it either was disturbed by the killer entering her room, or perhaps, she had the timing off a bit and the cat was agitated by the smell of blood.
Ive had cats and they get agitated (hungry?)when they smell blood.
Leave a comment:
-
Daily News 13th Nov 1888;
"Perhaps the most sensational bit of evidence tendered was that of a garrulous young woman who, with some dramatic force, imitated by voice and action a sort of nightmare cry of "Oh! murder!" which she declared she had heard just after she had been woke up by her kitten rubbing its nose against her face about half-past three or four o'clock on the morning of the murder. It was a faintish cry, she said, as though somebody had woke up with the nightmare, and though the evidence must be taken with the reserve that should attach to all such testimony, the time at which she believes she heard the cry would tally very well with all the circumstances of the case, and it is not impossible that that really was the death gasp of the poor woman in the clutches of her murderer."
Elizabeth Prater's evidence, Echo 12th Nov 1888;
"What was the next thing? - A black kitten, of which I am very fond, came to my bed, and rubbed itself against my face.
It disturbed you? - Yes, it tried to get into the bed, and awoke me. That must have been about half-past four, as I heard the clock chiming. I pushed the kitten away.
Yes? - And, just as I pushed the kitten away I heard, "Oh! Murder!" It was as if it was a nightmare. It was just "Oh! Oh! (in a faint, gasping way) - Murder!"
Where did the sound seem to come from? - Up the court, somewhere. I did not hear it a second time. I did not take any notice of it. Then I went to sleep.
You did not hear any singing? - None whatever. If there had been any at half-past one I should have heard it."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RockySullivan View PostHas Bowyer ever been identified in any records? Do they know his correct age for sure even?
(Penny Illustrated Newspaper, 17th Nov 1888)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostI've often wondered If Dew picked that up from a newspaper report (perhaps from his scrapbook) when compiling his memories, but either way it shows he didn't know Tom too well.
Edit: Sorry I took a look over at the bowyer threadLast edited by RockySullivan; 11-26-2015, 11:30 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostDew also said that army pensioner Tom Bowyer was a "youth" (among other howlers), so I'd treat his recollections with caution. Personally, I feel that Dew "puffed up" his involvement in the Ripper case.
Leave a comment:
-
Whose noses?
Originally posted by Robert St Devil View PostBTW do they ever find any of these women's noses?
Nothing was wrong with Polly's, Annie's, or Liz's noses, to the best of my knowledge.
Kate's nose was partially sliced off, and Mary Jane's face was pretty much flayed, including her nose.
Do you think the noses were important?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by richardnunweek View PostHi C4,
We have three reports,of a bonnet on the 8th/9th Nov,.Mrs Harvey allegedly said to Kelly.''I am leaving my bonnet for you''on the Thursday.
Mrs Prater reported seeing Kelly at 9pm 8th,at the passage, wearing a jacket and bonnet..
A bonnet was burnt in the grate..which was the only bonnet found therefore Mrs Harvey's.
Although Dew may have mentioned he never saw Kelly wearing a bonnet, it does not mean she did not on her last night...she may have had a date, Thursday evening. she may have wanted to wear it to the Lord mayors show the following day.
Regards Richard.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IchabodCrane View PostWhy did the man loitering in front of Miller's court not enter her room before 2.30?
I don't seriously believe that, but I've seen wackier theories in my time!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by curious4 View PostSorry, but according to Dew, who knew her quite well, Mary never wore a hat.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi C4,
We have three reports,of a bonnet on the 8th/9th Nov,.Mrs Harvey allegedly said to Kelly.''I am leaving my bonnet for you''on the Thursday.
Mrs Prater reported seeing Kelly at 9pm 8th,at the passage, wearing a jacket and bonnet..
A bonnet was burnt in the grate..which was the only bonnet found therefore Mrs Harvey's.
Although Dew may have mentioned he never saw Kelly wearing a bonnet, it does not mean she did not on her last night...she may have had a date, Thursday evening. she may have wanted to wear it to the Lord mayors show the following day.
Regards Richard.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Rocky Sullivan.
Senior moment..I obviously meant to say Maurice Lewis..not Bowyer..hope it did not confuse you too much..Sorry.
Regards Richard.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello ROSELLA.
Would the kettle have whistled?
BTW do they ever find any of these women's noses?
Leave a comment:
-
Pierre, it was a small fireplace and probably a big fire, but I'm not worried about the size of it in particular, just how it was made to flare up and burn, whatever its size. Mary probably had no kindling and no coal, so...?
And don't say clothing in the room (the remains of which were found) and a match, because, although clothing was undoubtedly thrown on a fire which was already burning, it would have needed wood to have got it alight and flaring in the first place. Plus, items of clothing placed on top of a fire smothers it.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: