Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Miller's Court Sun/Shadow Study

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Thanks for taking the time to do these. The demolition overlay is really neat-o.



    JM

    Comment


    • #17
      Thanks for those, Richard.
      I knew the Lloyd's sketch was pretty accurate when compared to the demolition photos as it's been discussed before-that's why I wondered if the artist was also accurate with the shadows when he sketched it in Nov 88.

      Comment


      • #18
        Thank-you for doing these. The information is amazing, probably as close as we will ever get to standing in Miller's Court.

        Comment


        • #19
          This is very cool.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Vincenzo View Post
            This is very cool.
            It's all the shadows that are making you cool
            G U T

            There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

            Comment


            • #21
              GUT, what lens/Focal length and format do you think was used for the demolition photo? I want to create an accurate 3D overlay and use it identify as many buildings/structures as possible. For instance the houses to the right in Miller's court (on the demolition photo), I can't workout if they are still standing or have already been partly demolished. Also it will help with future shadow studies. I can also get the building heights and scales correct.

              I'm assuming that the photo was taken on 120 roll?

              Ultimately it would be great to have a highly accurate 3D of the demolition photo which can be zoomed into or even create a virtually fly-thru.

              Where do you think the photographer was standing when taking that shot?
              JtRmap.com<< JtR Interactive Map
              JtRmap FORM << Use this form to make suggestions for map annotations
              ---------------------------------------------------
              JtR3d.com << JtR 3D & #VR Website
              ---------------------------------------------------

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by richardh View Post
                GUT, what lens/Focal length and format do you think was used for the demolition photo? I want to create an accurate 3D overlay and use it identify as many buildings/structures as possible. For instance the houses to the right in Miller's court (on the demolition photo), I can't workout if they are still standing or have already been partly demolished. Also it will help with future shadow studies. I can also get the building heights and scales correct.

                I'm assuming that the photo was taken on 120 roll?

                Ultimately it would be great to have a highly accurate 3D of the demolition photo which can be zoomed into or even create a virtually fly-thru.

                Where do you think the photographer was standing when taking that shot?
                G'day Richard

                If it was shot on 2 1/4 sq [or 6x6] then at a guess a 80mm looks pretty stock standard to me especially when compared to the sketch.
                G U T

                There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Though in 1928 I wouldn't rule out a plate Camera but it doesn't change the conclusion that it's a standard, so even if 35mm a 40 or 50.
                  G U T

                  There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Good piece of work Richardh.

                    I think that computer work like this will be one of the most significant advances in the study of the Whitechapel murders.

                    Thanks!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X