It wasnt Kelly theory
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mpriestnall View Post"They laughed at Galileo..."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mpriestnall View Post"They laughed at Galileo..."
I thought you might have some input on this thread!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by c.d. View PostI just find it extremely hard to dismiss or explain away Caroline Maxwell's testimony.
To me, it has the ring of truth despite the ramifications of that.
Hello Ms. Diddles,
Yes, her testimony is a head scratcher. I have no reason to believe that she was lying. Even though she was adamant, it is still possible that she was mistaken. Doubt we will ever know.
c.d.
It's just that on balance, I personally lean the other way.
Agreed, we are probably never going to know, frustrating though that is!
Leave a comment:
-
I just find it extremely hard to dismiss or explain away Caroline Maxwell's testimony.
To me, it has the ring of truth despite the ramifications of that.
Hello Ms. Diddles,
Yes, her testimony is a head scratcher. I have no reason to believe that she was lying. Even though she was adamant, it is still possible that she was mistaken. Doubt we will ever know.
c.d.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
so much for my poem on mary kelly then. ; )
Sorry, Abby!
I hadn't thought of that.
I liked that poem too!!!!!
Artistic license regardless of who the victim was????
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by c.d. View PostThrow in Occam's Razor on top of all those "dunnos" and the conclusion is that it was MJK. That should be the default position until proven otherwise.
c.d.
As a rule I always favour the simplest, least convoluted explanation of events.
This is perhaps my ripperological exception to the rule.
It is highly unlikely that we will ever be able to PROVE it from this distance (other may disagree).
I just find it extremely hard to dismiss or explain away Caroline Maxwell's testimony.
To me, it has the ring of truth despite the ramifications of that.
Leave a comment:
-
Throw in Occam's Razor on top of all those "dunnos" and the conclusion is that it was MJK. That should be the default position until proven otherwise.
c.d.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post
Hi Abby!
I've stated on here before that Maxwell's testimony is one of the facets of this case that really fascinates me.
I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I just can't get away from the fact that I find her utterly credible.
She was challenged by the coroner but stood firm, and I believe Abberline stated that she was of good character and not an obvious attention seeker (and I'm sure he would know one of those when he came across them).
He may be a questionable witness, but Lewis corroborates her and I believe the shop keeper was able to verify the day.
The idea that she got the wrong day holds little water.
I think there is a possibility that the person who she believed was MJK was infact another woman who sometimes stayed with Mary in 13 Miller's Court, but I'm not entirely convinced of that either.
There is the possibility of the later time of murder which, whilst not impossible I find unlikely.
It pains me to say it but on balance I lean towards the body in Miller's Court not being that of the woman known as MJK.
Yep, I know that throws up a lot more problems than it solves:
Who was the woman in Miller's Court?
Dunno!
What happened to the woman known as MJK?
Dunno!
Where did she go with no money?
Dunno!
Why did Joseph Barnett identify the body as being that of MJK?
Dunno!
..........You're welcome!!!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View PostFollowing on from another post/thread
Hi wulfy
Lord orsam did an analysis of the Marice Lewis and maxwell sightings of Kelly, and if Im not mistaken, concluded that Lewis was not reliable and was probably parrotting maxwell and or news accounts. However, he is adament that nothing directly contradicts maxwell and there is nothing wrong with her account. of course he is correct, but in terms of when Kelly was murdered IMHO all the evidence considered and balanced I go strongly with the night time murder. one of the reasons is the big fire and burnt clothes. Surely the murderer threw the clothes in the fire-which means it must have been a big fire that needed some time to get stoked up-time that wasnt available for the daylight morning time frame.
but either way-night time or morning murder-of course it was kelly- I really do share your exaspiration with the conspiracy fringe theories on this type of stuff. theres enough mysteries and sub mysteries to this case without inventing more where there isnt any.
I've stated on here before that Maxwell's testimony is one of the facets of this case that really fascinates me.
I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I just can't get away from the fact that I find her utterly credible.
She was challenged by the coroner but stood firm, and I believe Abberline stated that she was of good character and not an obvious attention seeker (and I'm sure he would know one of those when he came across them).
He may be a questionable witness, but Lewis corroborates her and I believe the shop keeper was able to verify the day.
The idea that she got the wrong day holds little water.
I think there is a possibility that the person who she believed was MJK was infact another woman who sometimes stayed with Mary in 13 Miller's Court, but I'm not entirely convinced of that either.
There is the possibility of the later time of murder which, whilst not impossible I find unlikely.
It pains me to say it but on balance I lean towards the body in Miller's Court not being that of the woman known as MJK.
Yep, I know that throws up a lot more problems than it solves:
Who was the woman in Miller's Court?
Dunno!
What happened to the woman known as MJK?
Dunno!
Where did she go with no money?
Dunno!
Why did Joseph Barnett identify the body as being that of MJK?
Dunno!
..........You're welcome!!!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View PostFollowing on from another post/thread
I go strongly with the night time murder. one of the reasons is the big fire and burnt clothes. Surely the murderer threw the clothes in the fire-which means it must have been a big fire that needed some time to get stoked up-time that wasnt available for the daylight morning time frame.
If it wasn't for the 4 am 'murder' cry I'd definitely be of the opinion it happened between 9 and 10, but then I also find it very difficult to dismiss Maxwell's conversation. Even if she had only talked to her a couple of times, she must have seen her loads of times going in and out of the court, as she said. There are loads of people on my street that I've only ever talked to a couple of times, but I still know their names and could easily identify them at a glance.
As you know, I'm very strongly of the opinion Farmer was a botched attempt, and that puts a different light on the morning ToD.
Leave a comment:
-
It wasnt Kelly theory
Following on from another post/thread
I've never understood this fascination with the 'it wasn't Kelly argument' - I suppose it helps support some daft conspiracy theory and people lap such rubbish up.
Either she was killed around 4 am, or after ~8.45. Neither of those times requires some other mystery body. I'm less inclined to believe the Lewis sighting as, unlike Maxwell, it seems he hadn't spoken to her that morning and wouldn't have known what she was wearing and could well have been mistaken. If the ripper did what he did to Eddowes in less than 10 minutes I suspect he could have carried out all those injuries to Kelly in less than half an hour, especially as he was likely concerned about being cornered in the room and 'working' quickly. He could have been out of there before 10 if it was the man Maxwell saw her with at 8.45 and they were back in her room by 9 or even 9.30.
Also depends how you view Farmer - if he was willing to try his luck in the morning in a lodging house I suspect he'd have been willing to try similar in a private room.
Lord orsam did an analysis of the Marice Lewis and maxwell sightings of Kelly, and if Im not mistaken, concluded that Lewis was not reliable and was probably parrotting maxwell and or news accounts. However, he is adament that nothing directly contradicts maxwell and there is nothing wrong with her account. of course he is correct, but in terms of when Kelly was murdered IMHO all the evidence considered and balanced I go strongly with the night time murder. one of the reasons is the big fire and burnt clothes. Surely the murderer threw the clothes in the fire-which means it must have been a big fire that needed some time to get stoked up-time that wasnt available for the daylight morning time frame.
but either way-night time or morning murder-of course it was kelly- I really do share your exaspiration with the conspiracy fringe theories on this type of stuff. theres enough mysteries and sub mysteries to this case without inventing more where there isnt any.Tags: None
Leave a comment: