Hi Richard
It should be noted that by this date Annie Chapman had been reported in the press as living in Dorset St and also Eddowes sleeping in the shed at Dorset St
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
was Kelly's death premeditated
Collapse
X
-
You`re correct, Richard, 99% of what we know about Kelly is titttle tattle.
Not the topic of your thread? I quoted you from your post.
Anyway, there is nothing to indicate Kelly`s death was a premeditated, other than her killer took a knife out with him that morning.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Jon,
We have no evidence that Mary ever used alleyways, we have her ex landlady telling a tale of Kelly bringing a man to her house to spend the night,
We also have the oral history from Cox's niece, of her bringing sailors back to room 13.
We can of course speculate that the Leman street haunt was evidence of her prostitution outside the safety of her room, but we can't be sure of a secluded outside location, neither can we be sure of the Black Mary image sometimes portrayed, swaying her hips outside the Ten bells, with a fist ready to floor anyone in her spot.
But all of the above, is not the topic my thread was referring to.
Regards Richard.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Richard
Originally posted by richardnunweek View PostHi,
The answer may lie with Kelly herself , who having a room , and probably more dignity then the others, would never entice a man to some infested alleyway , therefore the killer had to alter his MO.
At 26 years old (Kelly`s age) Annie Chapman and Polly Nichols both had a working husband and kids and had not yet fallen into the East End. Eddowes, despite been a wild one still managed to bring up some children somewhere along the line. Kelly was on the slide a good ten or fifteen years ahead of them.
Didn`t Kelly work the Leman St area?
I doubt she walked her companion all the way back to Dorset St, where Barnett lived, so, probably did use infested alleyways.
Leave a comment:
-
was Kelly's death premeditated
Hi,
We have had many threads over the years, suggesting the Mary Kelly may have not been the victim in room 13, and it all was a major conspiracy to escape from a fate, but lets look at the possibility that the killer was intending to kill Mary for some period of time...
The letter dated second November 88, was addressed 14, Dorset street, an address which was directly opposite Millers court, it was sent exactly one week prior to the murder, and maybe coincidently ? was the address of a certain Mrs Maxwell who was a major witness at the inquest.
Many coincidences rear up on Casebook, but surely anyone who can predict a Ripper murder , and send a correspondence to the police[ albeit out of area] stating an address just yards away from the forthcoming bloodbath, has to have
major psychic abilities or indeed the killer himself[ or accomplice ].
We should not dismiss this as coincidental , as it goes against mathematical odds.
Was Kelly being stalked as the next victim, from someone either having knowledge of the location of 14, Dorset street, or from a resident.
If the latter ..it would be a perfect spot to watch the planned victims habits , and the surroundings , he /she would also know her living in arrangements .
We should ask the question, why kill Kelly in room 13, why not in some secluded spot in the area.?
The answer may lie with Kelly herself , who having a room , and probably more dignity then the others, would never entice a man to some infested alleyway , therefore the killer had to alter his MO.
With regard to Mrs Maxwell , I feel sure, that her and her husband, should be treated with some suspicion, and one must ask the obvious.
Was her statement a ploy to give an alibi to someone?
Why send a letter to the Norfolk police, it had to be someone who had a knowledge of Yarmouth, for as Chris Scott pointed out, the mention of two piers shows that., we know that a Miss Smith, born in Yarmouth, was a resident of number 14 in 1891, was she in 1888?, and who would have possible knowledge of that, apart from her, we could suggest the Deputy of the residence , Mrs M's Husband, or even her..
It all boils down to was that letter simply a '' major'' coincidence , or something very relevant, I go for the latter.
Regards Richard.Tags: None
Leave a comment: