Originally posted by KatBradshaw
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How long was the killer in the room?
Collapse
X
-
-
Hello you all!
Kat, I agree with you in that sense, that JtR could have picked MJK intentionally. The most likely reason for this; the girls outside were better prepared for him than earlier. Mary Kelly probably thought herself to be safe indoors...
Pontius; in fact, my own estimation has been that 30 minutes. The reason,why the women weren't taken seriously; my impression is, that their statements didn't quite fit with the other ones!
All the best
Jukka"When I know all about everything, I am old. And it's a very, very long way to go!"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pontius2000 View Postthe killer didn't know if anyone was going to come or not. his murders were a natural progression in viciousness. so it's only understandable just as his killings evolved, his caution levels probably also evolved. he was very nearly caught at the Chapman crime scene and could've been seen at the Stride scene. taking a woman into her private room to kill her on one hand shows that he was being more cautious getting off the street. but at the same time, it was a situation that he had not been in before. and he had to be keenly aware that if anyone came to the door, he was caught. it could've been someone coming to ask for a spoonful of sugar. whatever the reason, he would've been caught. so I personally think it's ludicrous to think that he dallied around for another 2 hours after his victim screamed "murder!".
Surely if other serial killers teach us anything of the evolution of a killer it is that they become less cautious and even reckless which ultimately lead them to be caught.In order to know virtue, we must first aquaint ourselves with vice!
Comment
-
Originally posted by j.r-ahde View PostHello you all!
Kat, I agree with you in that sense, that JtR could have picked MJK intentionally. The most likely reason for this; the girls outside were better prepared for him than earlier. Mary Kelly probably thought herself to be safe indoors...In order to know virtue, we must first aquaint ourselves with vice!
Comment
-
Hello David!
Well, if we can relate JtR to the other serial killers to any extent:
1. He could have found the first murder bad, the second one easier etc.
2. Since he didn't get caught, he thought himself as an unmistakable superhuman!
Yes, extremely bad thoughts, no doubt about it!
All the best
Jukka"When I know all about everything, I am old. And it's a very, very long way to go!"
Comment
-
Lock
From KatI think I am the only person who has mentioned Kelly being chosen and I did stress that I did not mean in a Royal Conspiracy kind of way. All I meant was that the killer may have observed that she had a room and that there was no man living with her at that time. That way he would not be worried about being disturbed and if the hypothesis that he just tried her door and found it open is right then he was sure he wasn't going to find another man in there. I personally don't ascribe to that theory.
As to the latch, and I am quoting Sugden-'Joe Barnett later told Abberline that the key had been missing for some time. The door had a spring lock that fastened automatically when it was pulled to but the catch could easily be moved back from the outside by reaching through the broken window.'
Best Wishes,
HunterBest Wishes,
Hunter
____________________________________________
When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888
Comment
-
The door had a spring lock that fastened automatically
Best regards,
Ben
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben View PostThat's quite true, Hunter, but if the spring lock was left on the latch (acheived by flicking a switch on the lock itself) the lock would be prevented from engaging even when the door is closed. This appears to have occured on the night of Kelly's death.
Best regards,
Ben
I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that the spring automatically reset itself once the door was open- in other words the catch couldn't hold it open once released. At least that was the impression I got from Barnett. The spring was sprung- so to speak. If someone knows that was not the case- I stand corrected.
It was certainly locked when the body was discovered.
Best Wishes,
Hunter
Best Wishes,
HunterBest Wishes,
Hunter
____________________________________________
When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888
Comment
-
Originally posted by KatBradshaw View PostMany spring locks can be put on the latch though can't they? Then you can lock it properly as well. Mind you given that the door could be opened through the window makes little sense locking it at all.
That's why I was under the impression that the lock was used to keep the door shut- i.e. broken or missing door knob- instead of security. Could be wrong though. Maybe she figured no one would think about reaching through the window.
As far as a previous suggestion that a drunken Mary might have problems opening the door through the window, she had repeatedly done this enough times to be able to do it automatically- as long as she was conscious enough.
Best Wishes,
HunterBest Wishes,
Hunter
____________________________________________
When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888
Comment
-
Hi Hunter,
I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that the spring automatically reset itself once the door was open- in other words the catch couldn't hold it open once released.
All the best,
Ben
Comment
-
Originally posted by DVV View PostHi Pontius,
Mrs Maxwell has everything and everyone against her.
Phillips, Bond, Diddles, Cox...
Why do you "tend to give her some credence" ?
Amitiés,
David
edit: no doubt I made my point decisive with Diddles.
Comment
-
Comment