Thanks for posting that Chris,
I think that the reason we might be getting different views here of the same area on the photograph is that we are looking at two versions of the print that are differing in quality and seem to show different things.
It is possible that one of the enlarged sections of knee came from Don Rumblelow's print and one from the Evans/Skinner archive, or just that one is a better copy of the same print. If we put the two side by side though, I think it makes a vast difference to how we interpret what we are seeing there.
It does show though, how hard it is to interpret things from the photos as we are so reliant on the versions we have.
Bestest
Jane
xxxxx
I think that the reason we might be getting different views here of the same area on the photograph is that we are looking at two versions of the print that are differing in quality and seem to show different things.
It is possible that one of the enlarged sections of knee came from Don Rumblelow's print and one from the Evans/Skinner archive, or just that one is a better copy of the same print. If we put the two side by side though, I think it makes a vast difference to how we interpret what we are seeing there.
It does show though, how hard it is to interpret things from the photos as we are so reliant on the versions we have.
Bestest
Jane
xxxxx
Comment