I have been looking and looking for hours at the pics (and especially this incredible good enhanced one).
At first glance I always assumed she did wear sock(s).
Her right leg ascertained me she did wear something on her right leg, also because of the black line (improvised garter.??) you see...which in my humble opinion is no cut!
It is just too clean to be a cut..
And I myself rather see the blood stains on her right leg as if it is on fabric, not like smears on flesh...
On the left leg in between the ankle and the knee I see a slight difference in colouring as if a sock is there, allthough her toes are bare..? Legwarmers of some sort a possibility???
---------
I haven't got the time right now to look it up, but is there evidence MJK had had intercourse? Seems kinda difficult with all the fluids there to be sure of that- at least in those days...
But I just want to know for sure because Richards' post and other long known details got me thinking...
At first glance I always assumed she did wear sock(s).
Her right leg ascertained me she did wear something on her right leg, also because of the black line (improvised garter.??) you see...which in my humble opinion is no cut!
It is just too clean to be a cut..
And I myself rather see the blood stains on her right leg as if it is on fabric, not like smears on flesh...
On the left leg in between the ankle and the knee I see a slight difference in colouring as if a sock is there, allthough her toes are bare..? Legwarmers of some sort a possibility???
---------
I haven't got the time right now to look it up, but is there evidence MJK had had intercourse? Seems kinda difficult with all the fluids there to be sure of that- at least in those days...
But I just want to know for sure because Richards' post and other long known details got me thinking...
Comment