Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Weapons used on Mary?
Collapse
X
-
Agreed, a number of members accepted Nick's suggestion because he was a surgeon. It just goes to show even professionals can be wrong.
-
There was no axe or hatchet found in the room. Nick Warren's suggestion that one may have been used was based on MJK2 from the wall behind her bed showing the inside of her left leg and what appeared to be the rough outline of a split femur (just below what was highlighted in the posts above.) What looks like a split femur bone is actually the folds of her chemise and/or bedding sheets.
Leave a comment:
-
-
I still think the back wall has had something on it and wiped clean, certainly look like wipe marks to me. Probably those damn Juwes again...
Leave a comment:
-
I think the shot back across Mary from the wall POV was shot with a remote shutter, and the photographer either ducked or stepped left out of frame.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View PostThe photo taken from the opposite side to me does not seem to match up.
That is unless something has been moved between shots.
In the photo we see what appears to be her left hand; but there is clearly something on the table that would have obscured her left hand in the original shot.
Has the authenticity of the photo been definitively confirmed?
The clarity of the shot to me looks a modern mock-up of the scene.
I was under the impression that there was only one shot taken of MJK; the one we all know as taken on the day of the murder itself.
RD
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
The photo taken from the opposite side to me does not seem to match up.
That is unless something has been moved between shots.
In the photo we see what appears to be her left hand; but there is clearly something on the table that would have obscured her left hand in the original shot.
Has the authenticity of the photo been definitively confirmed?
The clarity of the shot to me looks a modern mock-up of the scene.
I was under the impression that there was only one shot taken of MJK; the one we all know as taken on the day of the murder itself.
RD
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostI don't think Kelly's bed needed to be moved; or not by much, if at all. It seems likely that the camera was rested on something, maybe that rolled-up blanket towards the end of the bed, aligned in the right direction, and the photo taken "remotely" so to speak.
I dont mean to be graphic needlessly, I think we need to recreate how things were accomplished physically to understand the scene, and the killer, better.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Robert St Devil View Postright behind those covers is where i have the camera too, however wondering, why one photo is wide lens and the other, uh, isn,t? i was thinking he may have had two cameras, one being a more portable variety and easier to place between the wall and bed cover.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostI don't think Kelly's bed needed to be moved; or not by much, if at all. It seems likely that the camera was rested on something, maybe that rolled-up blanket towards the end of the bed, aligned in the right direction, and the photo taken "remotely" so to speak.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
I don't think Kelly's bed needed to be moved; or not by much, if at all. It seems likely that the camera was rested on something, maybe that rolled-up blanket towards the end of the bed, aligned in the right direction, and the photo taken "remotely" so to speak.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: