Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Grisly

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Monty
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Monty,

    From the inside.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Yet locked they were Simon.

    Begs the questions who had access to the yard, who had access to the keys? (If there were any? And which way did the yard gets swing?

    Also begs one quite important question, why?

    Why go to all that trouble just to dump a body yards away?

    Also, why did they not dismember her? They had the equipment.

    Also.....

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Fisherman,

    Daily News, 1st September 1888—

    Dr. Llewellyn: "There was a very small pool of blood in the pathway which had trickled from the wound in the throat, not more than would fill two wine glasses, or half a pint at the outside. This fact, and the way which the deceased was lying, made me think at the time that it was probable that the murder was committed elsewhere, and the body conveyed to Buck's row."

    Her carotid artery had been severed. Where was all the blood?

    Echo, 1st September 1888—

    "It is his [Dr Llewellyn’s] impression that she was not murdered at the spot where her body was found, but that her throat was cut, the dreadful abdominal injuries then inflicted, and that the body was then carried, enveloped in her large, heavy cloak, and thrown outside the gateway at Essex Wharf. Mr. Seccombe, Dr. Llewellyn's assistant, is of the same opinions, especially, he says, as there was comparatively little blood where the deceased lay."

    Did anyone look for bloodstains in Winthrop Street?

    Evening News, 7th September 1888—

    "[Winthrop Street] is very narrow and very dark, and tenanted by many of the worst characters in London, and there seems to be no doubt whatever that the murder was committed there, and the body brought round the corner and left a few yards up Buck’s-row . . . a thorough search of the houses in Winthrop-street has not been made by the police yet, and there is good reason to believe that had this been done at the outset a clue to the murder and the actual spot where it took place would have been discovered."

    The Horse World of London, William John Gordon, 1893—

    "Harrison Barber, Limited . . . kill 26,000 London horses a year. All night and all day the work goes on, this slaying and flaying, and boning and boiling down, and this cooking for feline food. Go to any of their depots between five and six o'clock in the morning, and you will find a long string of the pony traps and hand-carts, harrows and perambulators used in the wholesale and retail cat's-meat trade."

    Perhaps Mrs Hardiman from 29 Hanbury Street would be in that line.

    Time was short. Perhaps somebody had to think quickly.

    I see nothing wrong with any of this as a working hypothesis/scenario.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Simon:

    "Firstly, the gate did not lead to their workplace."

    Point taken. 19-23 Winthrop Street, 150 yards from Brown´s it was. Meaning that we would have the butcher´s peering out onto Winthrop Street to see if the coast was clear, then silently carrying Nichols out onto the street, walking westwards with her for a hundred yards or thereabouts, passing Patrick Mulshaw who was guarding them sewer works, then making a sharp right, walking into an unlocked store (judging by the Goad´s), passing through that store, opening it´s unlocked back door, carrying Nichols through Brown´s Yard, silently opening the gates onto Buck´s Row, dropping Nichols on the ground, and then closing the gates behind her, locking them in the process. And no blood dripped from her still warm body onto the street, with a cut neck that produced oozing blood as Neil discovered her later? It was all spilled in the slaughterhouse AND on Buck´s Row, but nowhere inbetween?

    Is that about correct?

    "It's a workable scenario which sure beats the idea of the swift, silent phantom menace."

    I´m all for workable, practical scenarios instead of the phantom suggestion. As far as that goes, we´re on level with each other.

    But is this really a workable scenario?

    All the best,
    Fisherman
    Last edited by Fisherman; 05-28-2012, 02:27 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Fisherman,

    Firstly, the gate did not lead to their workplace.

    Secondly, most of Nichols' blood would have been spilled in the slaughterhouse. Hence none in the street and little on her clothing.

    It's a workable scenario which sure beats the idea of the swift, silent phantom menace.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    From the inside.

    Regards,
    Simon
    Didn`t Mrs Green`s lad next door work for Mr Brown. There must have been access at the back. I`m sure young Green opened up the stables to fetch the bucket of water and brush to clean away the blood stains.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    ...so it was Tomkins whodun it?

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    It might be worth noting that while Britten, Tomkins and Mumford were entertaining and murdering prostitutes, Mr Barber, their boss, lived on the premises, Mumford`s wife lived opposite the entrance to the slaughteryard, and Britten`s wife lived a few doors up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    If, Simon, Jack the Ripper was a triumvirate of three horse-butchers - would they drop the dead body of Nichols directly outside a gate leading to their working place? Just asking.

    And just like Lechmere asked before - how did they manage to carry her, neck severed to the bone and the gut cut open - to Buck´s Row, without spilling a drop of blood?

    It does not work for me, I must say.

    All the best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Monty,

    From the inside.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Brownes Stable yard door was found to be locked by Neil.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Roy,

    "Who's that creepin' round the corner?

    "Could that someone be . . . . [insert unlikely suspect's name here]?"

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post

    What we don't know, of course, is whether there was a way from Winthrop Street to Bucks Row/Durward Street via Mr. Brown's Yard.

    If so, surely this would have been the answer to a murderer's prayer.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	BROWN'S%20YARD.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	105.0 KB
ID:	663939

    In that case, Simon, the song would go something like this -

    In the front door
    Out the back door
    With a body
    Oozin' life

    'Satchmo' II

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    jibbing

    Hello Lechmere. That is correct. And the police noted that all their stories jibbed.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    violent

    Hello Dave. Of course, that's possible. But Richardson seems not to be violent.

    I suppose more research is needed along with evidence.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Lechmere
    replied
    Of course the three butchers were seperately questioned and cleared by the police at the time. But then maybe of course the police blundered. And there was no blood trail.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X