Originally posted by John Wheat
View Post
Personally I don't have a problem with an older Ripper. It might explain some hiccups. I don't think the Torso Killer was Jack. I think the Thames murder of 73 was the absolute pinnacle of human destruction. We're talking skinned faces being sewn to a scalped head human destruction. It makes Kelly look like he wasn't even trying. Theres no way that body was just a dump. So if a man is capable of that detail, and care, and apparently has a place to work without getting caught... and 15 years later, while apparently still dropping bodies, he just sucks at it? It's like Da Vinci doodling stick figures. I don't see how there is that much of a degradation while still successfully killing. I also don't think Stride was a Ripper victim. She was killed essentially standing, and thats a very different thing. Jack kills on the ground for a reason. Probably a kind of dumb reason, but he does. It's definitely part of his ritual. Why change it after an objectively very successful kill?And women died all the time. Still do.They can't all be the Ripper.
Also I'm pretty sure some of those torsos and perhaps even Johnny Gill were put through automatic saws. If the Ripper had one of those, I think he would have used it.
Comment