Originally posted by richardh
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ripper victims were caught sleeping?
Collapse
X
-
-
On the blurb to her book 'The Five' the author states that none of the victims knew each other. Is this correct? I'm sure I read somewhere that a couple of the canonical 5 were on speaking terms.
"Polly, Annie, Elizabeth, Catherine and Mary-Jane are famous for the same thing, though they never met. "
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
Therefore do we not have a contradiction, between the regulations and what the officers claim?
Such a pity that the beat records do not appear to exist for J division, when those for H do, which of course are in your extremely good book.
Of course it was suggested by the Echo, that the beats in J division had been amended in August, which could explain such.
Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe I’m being harsh but this book screams ‘’agenda’’ to me. I look forward to Mr B’s review. He was very harsh on that last Sickert bookI’m still hoping for the Van Gogh one just to read the review
I hope the new A-Z gets a good review
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dr. John Watson View PostWhile it has always been assumed the five confirmed victims of the mysterious serial killer were soliciting when they were killed, Dr Hallie Rubenhold has said that they were all sleeping, and most of them were rough sleeping.
Apparently this Ripper "expert" has come out with a book claiming it's unfair to suggest Jack's victims were streetwalkers and that they must have been sleeping while attacked. I haven't seen mention of this on Casebook, but I don't monitor the forum that regularly. Just wondering if this book is a joke or for real.
Dr. John
I was toying with buying "The Five" - and probably still will tbh - but although these women did sleep rough periodically, their final locations on pavements, squares, gutters, yards were not exactly conducive to a good night's kip, and I do not believe that can be correct. Even in the case of Tabram, as detailed by Tom Wescott in "The Bank Holiday Murders," she clearly planned to return to her doss as she was not even wearing many of her clothes, so if she did bed down on that landing, it was not what she intended. "What PC Barrett took to be the victim’s dress must have been her ‘long black coat’ and petticoat because a startling fact about Tabram is that she had gone out that night not wearing a dress, blouse, or shirt of any kind. We again refer to the description taken of her clothing on the morning of her murder: Dress: green skirt, brown petticoat, long black jacket, brown stockings, side-spring boots, black bonnet – all old. More than likely, her petticoat was of the long variety that reached down past her knees. Tabram had only been three weeks in the lodging houses and would have possessed more clothes than she was found wearing. Certainly she owned a blouse, so it doesn’t appear that she dressed to sleep rough that night, and with it being a lucrative holiday evening, had planned to return to her lodgings with more than enough money for her bed. This increases the likelihood that she had not been found sleeping by her killer but had been escorted to the spot for the purpose of murder."
Nice to meet you all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
Hi Steve,
Pall Mall Gazette 2/10/1890.
It’s full of errors, though. Polly is called ‘Annie Hyde’.
Gary
Thanks again Gary
Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Monty View Post
I’m fully aware of Thains and Neil’s statements.
As im aware such beats would be against regulations.
Monty
Such a pity that the beat records do not appear to exist for J division, when those for H do, which of course are in your extremely good book.
Of course it was suggested by the Echo, that the beats in J division had been amended in August, which could explain such.
Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
Yes his ego does seem to have been very large, however given how he treated the lower classes , Tomkins and Mann for example, I think if she had invented it 100% he would have exposed that.
Do you have the ref to the article you mentioned?
Steve
Pall Mall Gazette 2/10/1890.
It’s full of errors, though. Polly is called ‘Annie Hyde’.
Gary
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
There has to be just a little doubt, doesn’t there, Steve? Baxter had an ego larger than his brain, IMHO.
I found a press report recently which claimed Buck’s Row was indeed a popular rough-sleeping spot, but it couldn’t even get Polly’s name right, and claimed she had been killed in front of a blank wall.
Do you have the ref to the article you mentioned?
Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
While it is general accepted that the attack in Bucks Row was not heard, the account of Harriet Lilley gives the possibility that it was.
However because she was not called to the inquest, it is hard to judge her account, if it was made up, has some have suggested, Baxter would no doubt have exposed it.
Steve
I found a press report recently which claimed Buck’s Row was indeed a popular rough-sleeping spot, but it couldn’t even get Polly’s name right, and claimed she had been killed in front of a blank wall.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: