gestalt switch
Hello Velma.
"Isn't it strange how minds work? You can look at something the same way a hundred times, hear it discussed that way a hundred times, until eventually, you question something you never thought to question before."
I believe you have hit the nail on the head. In psychology, it's a gestalt switch.
Cheers.
LC
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Victim's simularities
Collapse
X
-
Interest withdrawn? Capital!
Hello David. No, serial killing is of no interest to me whatsoever.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Velma. Precisely! Delighted that this has not escaped your notice.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
no se
Hello David. Haven't the foggiest. Know little about the case since I don't care a feather or a fig about serial killing.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
noticed
Hello Velma. Precisely! Delighted that this has not escaped your notice.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
observations
Hello Addy.
"Yes I think MJK's killer also killed the other Ripper victims. I think she was a Ripper victim. Like I said before, the mutilations got worse from Nicholls on."
Except in the case where they were less.
"Why do you think she was not a Ripper victim?"
To believe she was a ripper victim I would need first to come to believe in a ripper. I don't.
"I think Stride is a Ripper victim and the Ripper was disturbed. Why? Because the theories about this have convinced me. I don't wish to explain the lack of mutilations, I think the theory is logical."
OK. But I should like to see any evidence of disturbance.
"Yes, he could have sought someone with her own place before. However, he probably didn't study his victims before killing them, he just picked them when he met them."
So perhaps it was not very important? And so perhaps Miller's Court was not what he really wanted?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Addy View PostI don't wish to explain the lack of mutilations, I think the theory is logical.
Addy
This week it has occurred to me that it is not the lack of mutilations that has to be explained, but the method of contact and the differences in the bruises/marks.
If he had been disturbed and not had time for the mutilations, that is one thing.
It seems to me that his different method of attack is what must be explained for Stride to be considered a Ripper victim.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Lynn,
Yes I think MJK's killer also killed the other Ripper victims. I think she was a Ripper victim. Like I said before, the mutilations got worse from Nicholls on. Why do you think she was not a Ripper victim?
I think Stride is a Ripper victim and the Ripper was disturbed. Why? Because the theories about this have convinced me. I don't wish to explain the lack of mutilations, I think the theory is logical.
Yes, he could have sought someone with her own place before. However, he probably didn't study his victims before killing them, he just picked them when he met them.
Greetings,
Addy
Leave a comment:
-
if JTR thinks that he's disturbed the neighbours, he only has to quickly shoot out and wait in Dorset st, before returning 5 mins later, ON TIP TOES !
If he's already in the room with her and kissing her goodbye or lieing in bed with her, how the hell did she manage to scream, fight back and get her bed sheet slashed open, defensive marks, by God he was careless, she should have been so easy to kill, because evidence points to him lunging at her from range, it always has.
why was he so careless when he could have easily killed her within the last 30 mins, in any romantic embrace that you care to imagine, he could have strangled her a thousand times over !!!!
odd isn't it !Last edited by Malcolm X; 01-28-2012, 01:12 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Lynn, if there was more than one ripper in Automn 1888, Albert DeSalvo must be a village.
Leave a comment:
-
questions
Hello Addy.
"he managed the previous times outdoors without alerting people, even while murdering in their ow backyard."
You seem convinced that the slayer of MJK slew the other 4. Why is that?
"As for Stride, I think the Ripper was disturbed when he killed her."
This is a common assumption. Do you believe this because you already are convinced that she is a "Ripper" victim and wish to account for the lack of mutilations?
"I think he didn't murder indoors before because he didn't meet someone with her own place before."
But could he not have sought such a person before deciding to kill and mutilate?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: