Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Probability of Double Event

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Grave Maurice
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    There's only evidence that Stride was seen snoodling with many different men....
    Snoodling? Are you sure you're talking about Stride's sexual encounters?

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    Many-many apologies for parachuting in too, but hasn't this discussion already been conducted on THREE different threads about Stride in July 2010? Although the current thread bears the benefit of having added Eddowes to the discussion...

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by johnr
    One: As far as I know, there is no evidence in any of the other four canonical murders of the murderer following his potential victim around: pestering her: buying her gifts and generally schmoozing her.
    There is no evidence the Ripper did any of this in Stride's case. In fact, there's absolutely no evidence that any man bought her any gifts. There's only evidence that Stride was seen snoodling with many different men, as prostitutes are wont to do.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Johnr
    replied
    Parachuting In With a "Time Out" Comment....

    ERR A-HEM....

    In my mind there are two considerations; one of which goes to support either sides of this debate.

    One: As far as I know, there is no evidence in any of the other four canonical murders of the murderer following his potential victim around: pestering her: buying her gifts and generally schmoozing her.

    Two: To those who subscribe to the theory that each of the five murders escalated in intensity. As if more violence, swifter ruthlessness and greater urgency occurred with each subsequent slaughter.
    Would the Ripper if he had been thwarted in sating his gruesome appetite with Stride, have speedily chosen a replacement victim, and avenged the unsated previous attempt?

    Therefore, point one suggests a different murderer, and point two, that his subsequent actions after the failed attempt on Stride, was followed by greater intensity in that next attempt.

    THis only works if people believe the Ripper needed to go beyond throat-slitting to achieve his goal.
    This is only my surmise.

    JOHN RUFFELS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    You should be ashamed of yourself, posing questions of logic to a drooling simpleton. You cruel, evil man, you!

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    P.S. Post a link to the post or thread and I'll answer your questions.
    If I do I dont know if you will be capable of finding it !

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    You should be ashamed of yourself, posing questions of logic to a drooling simpleton. You cruel, evil man, you!

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    P.S. Post a link to the post or thread and I'll answer your questions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    Either I didn't see it, or your 'point' made zero sense, like the one you just tried to make about Stride.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott
    Well the questions in that post were plain and simple easy to understand for a person with more than one brain cell who is able apply rational and logical thinking to this mystery.

    But of course I forgot they were directed at you !

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Actually, Trevor, if you look at the polls that have been conducted on Casebook, we are in the majority so it is quite warm and comfortable on our side.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post
    I knew you would see the light someday, Fish. Welcome to our side.

    c.d.
    Must be a cold and lonely place with just you 3 there !!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
    C.d:

    "You might as well bring up statistics showing how many women died that night from any cause be it illness, childbirth or being run over with a cart and then use that to show that it was normal for women to die on any given night."

    Geez, C.d - if I am disingenuous to compare two violent murders commited by knife - what does it make you, comparing a cold-blooded murder with childbirth ...?

    Can we please apply some sort of proportion sense here?

    I´m off for tea now - and I´m not really sure that I dare to see what will follow while I´m away!

    The best,
    Fisherman
    The point is Fish that BOTH of those arguments are disingenuous because they fail to make distinctions. In the first instance, all women who died are lumped together regardless of how they died. In the second instance, no distinction is made as to who killed the women and whether or not they were prostitutes. Both arguments fail.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scorpio
    replied
    Originally posted by Busy Beaver View Post
    If I am correct in recalling a 1988 Ripper Programme starring Lewis Collins, the timing of how fast the Ripper could walk from one destination to another was an issue. ie How fast could the Ripper walk from Berner Street/Dutfield Yard to Mitre Square. Was it possible for one killer to carry out the crimes in the given time frames? Do we know the Ripper routes? If he was a resident of Whitechapel, chances are he knew a lot of shortcuts.

    If we start looking at the frame of mind of the killer, then just possibly he was disturbed and wanted to find another victim to do the job properly? Which he duly did.

    Busy Beaver
    Hi,the Berner St/Mitre Sq time versus distance thing is not an issue. Somebody covered the distance in fourteen minutes, but i believe that Jack had about thirty minutes to accomplish this.
    Scorpio

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Because I like you, Fisherman, I wouldn't dream of accusing you of making stuff up. But I will suggest you're wrong on almost every count.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    C.d:

    "You might as well bring up statistics showing how many women died that night from any cause be it illness, childbirth or being run over with a cart and then use that to show that it was normal for women to die on any given night."

    Geez, C.d - if I am disingenuous to compare two violent murders commited by knife - what does it make you, comparing a cold-blooded murder with childbirth ...?

    Can we please apply some sort of proportion sense here?

    I´m off for tea now - and I´m not really sure that I dare to see what will follow while I´m away!

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Tom W:

    "Had the man owned a gun, we wouldn't be making any comparison."

    And if the Ripper had shot Liz?

    Let´s be fair here, Tom. I have never stated that the good lady was a prostitute, have I? Nor have I denied that she was killed by her husband, in her home.

    But that does not make her any less a woman in London who had her throat cut on the same night as the two single events, does it?

    The best,
    Fisherman
    Last edited by Fisherman; 09-23-2010, 11:08 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    C.d:

    "Was she a prostitute and the killer and the motive unknown?"

    No. Just like Liz, she was the victim of a domestic ...

    You see, C.d, just as I cannot know why she was killed and by whom, nor can you.

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X