Dutfield's Yard Video

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • drstrange169
    replied
    Much clearer, thanks Richard.
    Re the doorway, was there a slit window beside the door?
    In the Phil's photo some kind of shaded recess seems to be there.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'day Richard

    Much better on my 'puter.

    Leave a comment:


  • richardh
    replied
    Here's a gamma corrected image. It should be lighter now. Although it is altogether much lighter than it would have been on the actual night... which obviously was PITCH dark in the unlit areas (such as the immediate murder location).




    Can someone comment on the gutter? Any good? crap etc?

    thanks

    Below is the original version which, on my PC, looks much more night-time, atmospheric image.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by richardh View Post
    But do you have problems viewing other pictures on your PC GUT? or are my night shots alone in their darkness?
    All dark shots give me some difficulty but usually be adjusting the monitor angle things improve, but yours are vry dark and even with manipulation about all I can see is the lights and st the best some shapes.

    Leave a comment:


  • richardh
    replied
    But do you have problems viewing other pictures on your PC GUT? or are my night shots alone in their darkness?

    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Far to dark for me Richard, but as discussed previously my Computer's a tad old.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by richardh View Post
    Yes, Tom, I'll be putting in the gutter.



    On a general note, are those images too dark for some of you? I asked because when i view them on my PC they are light enough to see, but if I view them on various other PC's they are VERY dark. I know they are night shots but I made them light enough to see the details.

    like some feedback on this please.

    ta
    Far to dark for me Richard, but as discussed previously my Computer's a tad old.

    Leave a comment:


  • richardh
    replied
    Yes, Tom, I'll be putting in the gutter.

    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    Hi Richard. You going to put the gutter in?

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott
    On a general note, are those images too dark for some of you? I asked because when i view them on my PC they are light enough to see, but if I view them on various other PC's they are VERY dark. I know they are night shots but I made them light enough to see the details.

    like some feedback on this please.

    ta

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Hi Richard. You going to put the gutter in?

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Caligo Umbrator
    replied
    Originally posted by richardh View Post
    Some more screenshots of the victim's position. Lighting is not great. Still working on it.


    LINK (because it's a big image!)

    Thanks for feedback.
    Hi, Richardh,

    I think these look better than crime scene photographs.
    I like that you've got the gaslight colour pretty much spot-on.

    From what I've read on here and elsewhere, the position for the body looks about right.
    I think, given that we have descriptions that differ somewhat from each other, there's always going to be a degree of speculation on this matter.
    I'm certainly no authority in this area but it looks good to me.

    I'm really looking forward to some full-Rez renders.

    Yours, Caligo.

    Leave a comment:


  • richardh
    replied
    Some more screenshots of the victim's position. Lighting is not great. Still working on it.


    LINK (because it's a big image!)

    Thanks for feedback.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr. John Watson
    replied
    Originally posted by richardh View Post
    And herein lies a problem.... According to my calculations, the Dutfield's Yard (Hutchinson's) photo and various maps of the yard, the distance between the cellar grating and the swing of the open gate is 9ft (13.5ft with the closed). If the victim was semi-fetal then she would be about 4 feet from head to feet. There is no way her head could be near the grating with her feet close to the open gate unless she was over 9 ft tall!

    So was she lying only 5 feet into the yard and at least 7 feet from the grating or was she near the grating and quite a distance from the open gates?
    The description of her legs being "drawn up" doesn't necessarily mean in a full fetal position, as shown in the photograph posted. I think that's overdoing it a bit. More likely her legs were bent somewhat at the knees, as expected of a body resting on its side. And I agree with the feet almost touching the edge of the open gate, as noted by one of the witnesses. Just an observation.

    John

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'day Dusty

    Meets the requirements, I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • drstrange169
    replied
    Hello Tom,

    Not exact, but you get the idea.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    If you're facing a wall and your knees are buckled then your feet can not be close to the same wall unless the legs are prostrate from the knee down.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • drstrange169
    replied
    Just had a quick refresh of the testimonies and Baxter Phillips said that when he arrived he saw the,
    "... face turned towards the wall ... feet close to the wall."

    Johnston observed that,
    " ... the knees were nearer the wall than the head."

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X