I have never understood why Schwartz's veracity has to be an all or nothing proposition. In other words, he was lying or completely telling the truth. Given the fact that he came in in the middle of the movie and stayed only a minute or two and didn't understand the dialogue and complicated matters by giving his statement through an interpreter, I think the best approach is to simply take his statement as true but with a grain (or several) of salt.
Just my take on it.
c.d.
Just my take on it.
c.d.
Comment