Originally posted by RavenDarkendale
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was Stride Really a JtR Victim?
Collapse
X
-
cts2914, welcome to Casebook.
Stride was killed by a local gan
I too have a strong suspicion that Stride was not a Ripper victim - but my money would be on Kidney (her former lover).
Can you please explain a little more about you thinking re a gang? I'm interested.
Phil
Comment
-
Me thinks someone would enjoy counting your money.
Oh, I think it's safe, Digalittledeeperwatson.
I think time will reveal that Stride was not a JtR victim. Whether her killer was Kidney is another thing - but it's a reasonable bet, IMHO.
Since I know nothing of what the poster suggesting a "gang" has in mind, I'll reserve judgement until I hear his/her reasoning.
Phil
Comment
-
Welcome CTS,
Just a heads up since you're new to the boards...
It is a good idea to follow up with an explanation of evidence when providing an absolute and direct answer like the one you gave. The how, who, when, what, where questions are a good place to start.
I look forward to your response.
Cheers
DRoy
Comment
-
Kidney's guilt
Based upon what? That he was abusive towards her? This comes from Liz. Who is apparently known to be a liar and an alcoholic. I know these women were murdered horribly but that doesn't make them good honest people. Kidney gets thrown under the horse and cart if you will based on what amounts to basically diddley-squat.Valour pleases Crom.
Comment
-
And I try to keep an open mind, Digalittledeeperwatson.
In my view, Kidney is more likely to have killed her than "Jack".
His actions after the murder seem unusual to me. The murder, for me, lacks many of the features of a JtR killing - the location seems wrong, and there is no mutilation - of course, I accept that there could be other reasons for that.
"Jack", again in my opinion, confined his activities north of Whitechapel High St (though I note recent research that could link Aaron Kosminski to the Berner St area). Moreover, rather than the traditional adjunct of the alleged "double event" involving a frustrated serial killer rushing north to find another victim; I find it far more likely that "Jack" was already probably in search of his only victim of the night, in the Aldgate area.
If (and I emphasise the if) Schwartz saw anything, and what he saw was correctly interpreted, in every sense of the word, then what he saw might well fit a vengeful Kidney encountering or finding his former lover and angrily remonstrating with her. What Schwartz appears to have said would also fit a women in Liz's relation to Kidney.
End of my explanation. Please don't interpret it as a "theory" or my only thought on the subject, but it is the interpretation I favour most at the moment.
Whether you accept it is of no concern to me.
Phil
Comment
-
What facts are there to substantiate "Liz's situation"? I accept and respect the position you are coming from as a very likely possibility, but there is insufficient verifiable data to make it likely probable. And Schwartz, hey Israel, is this thd man you saw attacking the woman? Also, Kidney having an alibi maybe. It would be the worst police work never done.Valour pleases Crom.
Comment
-
Digital,
They didn't catch her killer whether it was Kidney, BSM, Pipeman, 'Jack', or anyone else. That's just this murder. They tried. They interviewed everyone they could think of yet still didn't catch him/them. No I don't think they were stupid, perhaps their killer(s) were that sneaky or lucky.
Cheers
DRoy
Comment
-
Originally posted by DRoy View PostCaz,
The problem with saying that it was at least a little loud is that nobody claims to have heard it. Yes there was music from the club but did it drown out the three screams?
In my opinion it's one more piece of Schwartz that nobody can verify and doesn't seem to make sense. Maybe the screams weren't loud because there was no three screams.
Cheers
DRoy
Love,
Caz
X"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
Comment
Comment