Originally posted by Monty
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was Eddowes Already Dead, When Seen By Lawende & Levy?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostLooks to me like he did have a field day with Kelly. Besides, her heart was missing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostHi John.
Yes, but the forensic pathologist was making a general observation, when you include the actual specifics of these murders the details present a different picture.
The point Dr. Ind was making was that the removal of the uterus was done by a right-handed person. His comment was not meant to refer to every wound on the body, that was not necessary. We already have medical opinion that a right-handed man was at work, unless we choose to believe he stood directly in front of each victim and sliced their throats left-handed, and received a face full of blood for his troubles.
And, as I pointed out, Chapman's body was not laid down by a man who intended to work left-handed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View PostBut if the killer did not remove the organs at the scene then it would not matter not if an octopus removed them sometime later would it where would that take us.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
You might consider that a serious consideration, that doesn't mean others should.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John G View PostHow then could they summon assistance?Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostAnd I believe you have wrote that the City constables (Harvey, Watkins) did not carry whistles?
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View PostBut if the killer did not remove the organs at the scene then it would not matter not if an octopus removed them sometime later would it where would that take us.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Was the apron still a menstrual rag stolen by a stray dog?
Comment
-
Originally posted by pinkmoon View PostIn portrait of a killer Patricia carries out an experiment in a warehouse with the same lighting conditions present at the time of the murders and she examines the light a police lantern would generate...
I can't remember which one it was at the moment...
The garrotte is a very interesting theory if it was followed up with a deep throat slash straight away it couldn't be detected think you onto something there my friend.
I'm inclined to think his suggestion has considerable merit.
The garrott was a popular weapon in the 1860's and reports of its use continued for decades.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostThere is a press story somewhere here on Casebook that tells us one of the three lamps in Mitre Square was not working on the night in question.
I can't remember which one it was at the moment...
"This (Sunday) morning the lamps were burning brightly, but a curious little circumstance was mentioned by the wife of a caretaker living directly opposite the spot where the murdered woman was found. As she went home with her little girl on Friday night she noticed that the lamp in the north-west corner of the square was so dull that she could scarcely see her way. This must have thrown the pavement on which the body was found into comparative darkness, and may thus have in some way contributed to the selection of the spot by the murderer."
Lloyds Weekly News, 30 Sept. 1888.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
Comment