Originally posted by DJA
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Kidney From Hell
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
So the killer had the time to walk down Church passage to the murder location, carry out the murder and mutilations, rifle her pockets, surgically remove vital organs with insufficent light available to him, then cut a piece of her apron finishing off, with carving out letters to her cheeks and then nicking her eyelids all in under 5mins or 3 if you accpet what Dr Sequeira says
You need a reality check !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Jack and kate walk through chuch passage ,a little small talk , terms and conditions are agreed to. they arrive at the darkest corner of the square where by kate has placed herself up against the wall ,fence ,gate , whatever . [Her back facing jack]
kate turns around to see where jack is, at that moment he seizes his chance and decides to attact kate slashing side to side with his knife cutting her face and eveylids and nose off. All the time kate is screaming at the very top of her voice for the whole of Mitre Square to hear. Jack decides to shut her up so grabbing her by the throat he squeeezes the life out of her as she collapses to to ground . He takes out his knife and cuts her throat nearly servering her neck right off ,as he is just about to start disembowing her abdomen people from inside the buildings surrounding Mitre Sq come rushing out to see where all the screams, scuffle ,and echoing noises were coming from .
Completly oblivious to the large crowd that has now gathered around him, jack starts to extract kates kidney and intestines while onlookers throw up everywhere . He tells them to all f off as he cuts kates apron to wipe his hands of blood , faeces, and vomit from the odd onlooker, jack quickly makes his escape via Mitre st to the shock and horror of the good people of Mitre Square.
The reality is , the'' Vs'' and the niks to the eyelids where done after death. Not before. Thank you F.W Foster'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
Or this senario
Jack and kate walk through chuch passage ,a little small talk , terms and conditions are agreed to. they arrive at the darkest corner of the square where by kate has placed herself up against the wall ,fence ,gate , whatever . [Her back facing jack]
kate turns around to see where jack is, at that moment he seizes his chance and decides to attact kate slashing side to side with his knife cutting her face and eveylids and nose off. All the time kate is screaming at the very top of her voice for the whole of Mitre Square to hear. Jack decides to shut her up so grabbing her by the throat he squeeezes the life out of her as she collapses to to ground . He takes out his knife and cuts her throat nearly servering her neck right off ,as he is just about to start disembowing her abdomen people from inside the buildings surrounding Mitre Sq come rushing out to see where all the screams, scuffle ,and echoing noises were coming from .
Completly oblivious to the large crowd that has now gathered around him, jack starts to extract kates kidney and intestines while onlookers throw up everywhere . He tells them to all f off as he cuts kates apron to wipe his hands of blood , faeces, and vomit from the odd onlooker, jack quickly makes his escape via Mitre st to the shock and horror of the good people of Mitre Square.
The reality is , the'' Vs'' and the niks to the eyelids where done after death. Not before. Thank you F.W Foster
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by DJA View PostNo blood spray.
Eddowes was strangled.
The eyelid cuts required light,so not done in Mitre Square where she was found.
Cheers, GeorgeOpposing opinions doesn't mean opposing sides, in my view, it means attacking the problem from both ends. - Wickerman
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
Comment
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
Dave, do you have a theory as to which injuries were inflicted in Mitre Square and which were inflicted before Mitre Square?
Cheers, George
The other injuries would have been inflicted in the corner of Mitre Square.My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aethelwulf View Post
This thread has already descended into farce and should be renamed 'most ridiculous theories'!
Best you read your own original post.
Are you aware of the significance of Eddowes' navel being cut around?
Rhetorical questionLast edited by DJA; 04-07-2022, 02:24 PM.My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
-
Originally posted by DJA View Post
Dr Brown thought the murderer possessed ‘a good deal of knowledge as to the position of the organs in the abdominal cavity and the way of removing them’
Best you read your own original post.
Are you aware of the significance of Eddowes' navel being cut around?
Rhetorical question
6 days too late with this one I'm afraid.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
There is no evidnce that Foster attended the crime scene all his sketches were made later and some may have been from the sketches made by Dr Brown.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Pure conjecture on your part ,
Show me the sketchers made by Dr Brown that are time and dated before 3.45am 30th sept 1888 ?
The ''truth'' is Eddowes facials injuries were done after death , and the Foster sketch proves it.
ITs impossible they were done while she was alive and any attemt to prove otherwise is futile . see last post'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
There is no evidnce that Foster attended the crime scene all his sketches were made later and some may have been from the sketches made by Dr Brown.
www.trevormarriott.co.ukMy name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
Show me the sketchers made by Dr Brown that are time and dated before 3.45am 30th sept 1888 ?
The ''truth'' is Eddowes facials injuries were done after death , and the Foster sketch proves it.
Opposing opinions doesn't mean opposing sides, in my view, it means attacking the problem from both ends. - Wickerman
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by DJA View Post
The two Xanthelasmas required light and a small scalpel,so Sutton strangled Eddowes inside 6 Mitre Street, whilst waiting for Edward Watkin to make his 1.30am pass with lantern.
The other injuries would have been inflicted in the corner of Mitre Square.
Cheers, GeorgeOpposing opinions doesn't mean opposing sides, in my view, it means attacking the problem from both ends. - Wickerman
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
Comment
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
So Dave, what was the purpose of the two Xanthelasmas incisions, and the other injuries inflicted after her death and not actually required for her demise? Do you know if Sutton was a Mason?
Cheers, George
Apart from cutting her throat,most of her injuries were actually driven by research/displaying her medical history.
Openshaw was a Mason.After taking over as Curator of the Pathology Museum,he became Sutton's boss.
My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
Comment