Kidney From Hell

[FISHY1118]

He happens to be correct though.

[Coroner] Can you tell us what was the cause of death? - Dr Brown The cause of death was haemorrhage from the throat. Death must have been immediate.


[Coroner] Have you any doubt in your own mind whether there was a struggle? - Dr Brown I feel sure there was no struggle. I see no reason to doubt that it was the work of one man.


Your aware of the meaning of ''immediate'' are you not ?

Now if someone puts their own hand over their mouth and pretends [pretends mind you ] to cut their throat, So how do they perform the ''Vs'' on each side of the their cheekes ?

No struggle ,throat cut immedialtly, death instant , now do you see why the ''Vs'' were after death ?

And they are ''Vs'' and ''niks'' , and Fosters sketch proves it, just 2 hours later . To suggest anything else is .....


If it doesnt agree with experiment its a lie .

[FISHY1118]

No where near it.

[DJA]

Thats also pure conjecture on your part

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

He happens to be correct though.

[FISHY1118]

You don't like that sketch either do you ?,because it's tells the real truth , and we can't have that now can we?

[DJA]

[FISHY1118]

"Death was instant ,no sign of a struggle "

Good to see you think that the doctor was of pure conjecture as well ,after all he did examine the body

[DJA]

[Trevor Marriott]

The Eddowes sketch is something ive posted before, its an extremly important piece of evidence that shows that the niks to her eyelids and the ''V'' on her cheeks were indeed deliberatley made after death .

Thats pure conjecture on your part

There was no struggle where Eddowes tryed to remove the hand of the ripper from her mouth thus resulting in he facial injuries,as some have suggested. Thats just rubbish , nor were they done while the nose was being cut off .

Thats also pure conjecture on your part

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[FISHY1118]

The Eddowes sketch is something ive posted before, its an extremly important piece of evidence that shows that the niks to her eyelids and the ''V'' on her cheeks were indeed deliberatley made after death .

There was no struggle where Eddowes tryed to remove the hand of the ripper from her mouth thus resulting in he facial injuries,as some have suggested. Thats just rubbish , nor were they done while the nose was being cut off .

Also whats of paramount importance it the date and time of the sketch , 3.45am just 2hours after death , most people refer to the post mortem pic of Eddowes from the morge that shows the stitching to her face and body, thus making it look like a cross cut or ''X'' due to the stict up . Foster drew it as exactly how it was on the morning right after she was killed . .

[Aethelwulf]

Spotted this research paper related to the Lusk kidney (from 2008): A kidney from hell? A nephrological view of the Whitechapel murders in 1888 (https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article...38?login=false). An interesting read and includes some photos of the experts consulted. There is also a mortuary sketch of Eddowes that I hadn't seen before (cited as Evans and Rumbelow) - the stand out feature being the utterly crude and butchered nature of the main abdominal wound - does not look like something someone with medical knowledge might do IMO.