Originally posted by Cogidubnus
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Eddowes Pawn Ticket/Finances (moved from another thread)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Barbara. But if John is truthful, they had spent that money by mid-day Saturday. Kate was then supposedly off to Annie's for more funds.
Cheers.
LC
broke all day, but roaring drunk -- or was she?
Released too soon . . . if she was really THAT drunk, would she have been released so soon?
surrounded by policeman but murdered and mutilated by a speedy, silent wraith.
a lot of very strange circumstances by the way I see things.
Comment
-
strange
Hello Velma. Thanks.
"Not to mention that she was killed in a place almost completely surrounded by policemen and none of these trained people saw or heard anything -- going from memory of a long ago thread now."
Your memory serves you well.
"broke all day, but roaring drunk -- or was she?"
There were no fewer than 4 officers--Robinson, the one who helped her to Bishopsgate, Hutt and Byfield--who would affirm that she was completely snoggered.
"Released too soon . . . if she was really THAT drunk, would she have been released so soon?"
She was questioned and pronounced sufficiently sober.
"surrounded by policeman but murdered and mutilated by a speedy, silent wraith."
Yes. And this has intrigued me for nearly 40 years.
"a lot of very strange circumstances by the way I see things."
But the strangest of all are John's dicta.
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Barbara. But if John is truthful, they had spent that money by mid-day Saturday. Kate was then supposedly off to Annie's for more funds.
Cheers.
LC
Regards, Jon S.
(struggling on my third computer in 6 months, they sure don't make things the way they used to )Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
On a more serious note than above, jasn't it always been assumed that the victims had earned their money for a bed, sometimes several times over, but spent it on drink instead? Obviously clients are not going to come forward to admit that, yes, I went with Annie, polly etc so we have no way of knowing. But it is interesting to speculate if Jack did spend time with the victims ensuring that they were drunk and vulnerable. Then, to provide some sort of an alibi perhaps, he left but made arrangements to meet later for "more of the same." None of the women could refuse the chance to be plied with drink in return for an encounter so it would be an offer they couldn't refuse.
Maybe that would explain why Kate went the wrong way after leaving the police station or why Stride was hanging around waiting for someone?
Possible?
regards,If I have seen further it is because I am standing on the shoulders of giants.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tecs View Post
Maybe that would explain why Kate went the wrong way after leaving the police station or why Stride was hanging around waiting for someone?
Thanks for the GM funnies.
Yes, I can hear the female voice assisted commands now...."do you wish to apply the brakes full, or slowly?"...stomp...stomp....stomp...." please reply, is this an emergency stop?" (smash!).
Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Barbara. But if John is truthful, they had spent that money by mid-day Saturday. Kate was then supposedly off to Annie's for more funds.
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
What's in a name?
Hello Barbara. Thanks.
The pawn ticket read Friday. But, if you take John's testimony at inquest and place it in conjunction with his two interviews and construct a time line, BOTH Friday and Saturday pawnings become problematic.
Here's a titbit. Was Kate Eddowes's name on the pawn ticket?
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostWhat ever name she gave would be on the pawn ticket, yes?Christopher T. George
Organizer, RipperCon #JacktheRipper-#True Crime Conference
just held in Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018.
For information about RipperCon, go to http://rippercon.com/
RipperCon 2018 talks can now be heard at http://www.casebook.org/podcast/
Comment
-
-
keeping up with Jones
Hello Jon. Thanks.
You are correct about stolen goods. And it would make more sense that John had stolen them than to have bought them whilst being broke.
Jones was VERY good about recognising stolen property. He was called on by various courts to testify to same.
Cheers.
LC
Comment
Comment