Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eddowes Pawn Ticket/Finances (moved from another thread)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lynn cates
    replied
    Friday

    Hello Jon. Thanks. I will agree with THIS--whoever owned the boots, they were DEFINITELY pawned on Friday.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Hi Lynn.
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Jon. Thanks. Yes, that's the one. Too bad he could not recall whether it was day (Saturday) or night (Friday).

    Cheers.
    LC
    Hey, when you live without a watch knowing the exact time is always a chore, and if it was anywhere near midnight when his boots were pawned then whether it was late Friday night or early Saturday morning is superfluous to him.

    Wasn't that ticket dated 28th? - so Friday.

    Regards, Jon S.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    day/night

    Hello Jon. Thanks. Yes, that's the one. Too bad he could not recall whether it was day (Saturday) or night (Friday).

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by curious View Post
    I take it "claimed" is the important word here.

    Is there a record of him appearing anywhere barefoot?

    My missus pawned the boots, and I stood outside the shop with bare feet.
    Daily News, 5 Oct. 1888.

    Regards, Jon S.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    new?

    Hello Colin. Thanks. Yes, that is correct. Of course, they were not so new if they both walked from Hunton.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    possibilities

    Hello Velma. Thanks. Oops, missed your earlier post.

    Those are ALL possibilities.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    no clue

    Hello Velma. Thanks. "The Times" has Anne Kelly.

    No idea what it means. Open to suggestion.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Velma. Thanks. Yes, quite difficult. But she often used Conway, as Sally points out, and now the switch to Anne Kelly. What does it mean?

    Cheers.
    LC
    Actually, it was apparently Jane Kelly with the pawn broker and Mary Anne Kelly at the jail.

    No idea what it means.

    What do you think it means?

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by Cogidubnus View Post
    Nothing to say he couldn't have pawned a nice new set of boots, and the deal he got was five bob and an ancient pair in return...

    Just a thought

    Dave
    good, hadn't thought of that possibility

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Nothing to say he couldn't have pawned a nice new set of boots, and the deal he got was five bob and an ancient pair in return...

    Just a thought

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello (again) Velma. John claimed he was barefoot after the pawning. Of course, he worked some on Saturday morning, so must have been shod by then?

    Cheers.
    LC
    One (unintended?) side-effect of pawning your boyfriend's boots would be that he would be seriously restricted in his movements until he got hold of another pair.

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello (again) Velma. John claimed he was barefoot after the pawning. Of course, he worked some on Saturday morning, so must have been shod by then?

    Cheers.
    LC
    I take it "claimed" is the important word here.

    Is there a record of him appearing anywhere barefoot?

    And how could he have been shod on Saturday morning if:

    1. she pawned his boots Friday night?
    OR
    2. she pawned his boots Saturday morning?

    Either he had more than one pair of boots or . ..

    maybe she pawned stolen boots . . . .

    or perhaps she didn't pawn any boots at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    barefoot and . . .

    Hello (again) Velma. John claimed he was barefoot after the pawning. Of course, he worked some on Saturday morning, so must have been shod by then?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    switch

    Hello Velma. Thanks. Yes, quite difficult. But she often used Conway, as Sally points out, and now the switch to Anne Kelly. What does it mean?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
    Hi Lynn

    Good point. Maybe Victorian respectability.

    But, John Kelly states he is single on his admittance into the Infirmary later that year.
    Do we have any record of Kelly ever going by a different name?

    After Eddowes was killed, did John have boots, or was there any mention of him showing up barefoot?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X