Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

John's Echo Interview

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Jon. Thanks. No reason at all--even though he did not mention it at inquest. Of course, it seems to have been a burning question--how he survived after his tale of penury.

    And that could explain his not looking for Kate. Why bother with her if he has money?

    Cheers.
    LC
    The Lodging Keeper stated at the Inquest that he would have "trusted" all the lodgers he knew.


    If they had told me the previous day that they had no money I would have trusted them. I trust all lodgers I know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Thems the fellas Simon,

    Kudos to you for taking my post in good humour, I respect that.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Monty,

    We are from the future.



    Sorry about the crap picture, but we based our technology on Microsoft instead of Apple.

    Regards,

    Simon and [of course] Trevor

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    Obvioulsy an award winning act
    Look them up on Youtube Trevor....outstanding comedy act.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    Oh Lordy, are we all getting excited now.

    Kellys actions re the bonnet are quite innocent.

    What was pawned exactly?

    Are we party to the full dealings of witnesses? No...so we conject. Its Cross all over again.

    Trevor and Simon....sounds like a kids TV act from the 80s.

    Monty
    Obvioulsy an award winning act

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Cooney's

    Hello Simon. Thanks. You mean at Cooney's? (You may be thinking of the Liz examiner.)

    Yes, that would have been the thing to do.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Lynn,

    Perfectly possible. Warum nicht?

    However, if John Kelly had only taken up Frederick Blackwell's generous offer of credit Mitre Square would not have happened and he could have sailed off into the sunset with his beloved Kate.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    work

    Hello Simon. Thanks.

    Quite. But what of the suggestion that he had found work at the markets?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Lynn,

    John Kelly wasn't tramping the streets or staying at the casual ward between Friday 28th September and the latter end of the following week, so he certainly appears to have suddenly found some money from somewhere.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    explanation

    Hello Jon. Thanks. No reason at all--even though he did not mention it at inquest. Of course, it seems to have been a burning question--how he survived after his tale of penury.

    And that could explain his not looking for Kate. Why bother with her if he has money?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Jon. Don't know. But surely John was eating and he was paying his rent at Cooney's? Whence das Geld?

    Cheers.
    LC
    When did he earn the 6d?
    Any reason he couldn't have earned more in subsequent days?

    Jon S.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    En donde esta, y por que?

    Hello Simon. Thanks. I can live with that.

    But then, where the devil was she and why?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Lynn,

    A penny gets you a pound if Eddowes went anywhere near the Mile End casual ward on the night of 28th February.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Don't bother.

    Hello Simon. Thanks. That is helpful.

    I could nearly buy the "bother" business (oops, alliterated again) if only John or a lad from Mile End had spelled it out.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Lynn,

    The Casual Poor Act 1882 stated that "A casual pauper shall not be entitled to discharge himself from a casual ward before nine o'clock in the morning of the second day following his admission."

    If Eddowes had stayed at the Mile End Casual Ward on the night of Friday 28th September, she would not have been discharged until 9.00 am on Sunday 30th September and thus missed her appointment with fate in Mitre Square.

    Unless, of course, there had been a convenient "spot of trouble".

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X