Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Time Factor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Thanks Lynn

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Ultimate

    Hello Dave. Thanks.

    It was in "The Illustrated Police News." I think "The Ultimate" has a reproduction.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Hello Lynn

    Just to say I appreciated the "half of Diddles" comment as well as this latest!

    (Is there a source for the sketch, or the data, please?)

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    sketch

    Hello Dave. I saw one sketch that looked like 3-6 inches from the fence. She was well nigh adjacent. (Of course, a sketch may not capture reality.)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    simple

    Hello Colin. Thanks. Surely, this is the simplest view.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    gap

    Hello MB. There was about a three minute gap between "No" and the fall. Albert was making a second trip to the water closet.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    I merely posed a question...(and to be fair Lynn, Jon and Chris attempted answers)... is there any more information anywhere please? How far was she actually from the fence when discovered...and from the steps...

    Looking at the photos, clearly the body couldn't really have literally been both "between the steps and the partition between the yard and the next. Her head was near the house, but no part of the body was against the wall", and at the same time "Her head was towards the back wall of the house, nearly two feet from the wall, at the bottom of the steps, but six or nine inches away from them"...something's not quite right there

    Speculatively, "Nearly two foot from the wall", (thanks Chris!), if actually a reference to the fence, could be suggestive...

    Still puzzled

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Location

    Firstly , he does not hear a violent struggle
    Why does a swift and efficient killing have to involve a violent struggle?

    , and secondly he is not even sure it was from the yard of 29 .
    How so?

    "He heard (first visit) a voice say, quite close to him, No'".
    "He then heard (second visit) a sort of a fall against the fence, which divided his house from No.29".

    The voice was "quite close to him" and the fall was "against the fence which divided his yard from No.29". If the voice was not in his own yard, yet was "quite close to him", where else could it have been?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    It's All In The Timing

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Jon.

    "the body must have been pretty much laid along the bottom of the fence.

    Either her or the killer could have bumped the fence as the assault began."

    I'm with you. Cadosch's "bump" was Annie falling.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Hi Lynn,

    So am I.

    Leave a comment:


  • moonbegger
    replied
    Hello Dave ,

    However, when the body is discovered it isn't lodged against the fencing at all...it is parallel to the fencing...does anyone know for sure how far from the fencing it actually is? If there's any significant distance, then surely Cadosche's testimony is at least somewhat devalued?
    I know these don't really mention exactly how close she was to the fence , but ..
    James Kent ..
    I saw a woman lying in the yard between the steps and the partition between the yard and the next. Her head was near the house, but no part of the body was against the wall. The feet were lying towards the back of Bayley's premises. (Witness indicated the precise position upon a plan produced by the police-officers).
    Chandler..
    I saw the body of a woman lying on the ground on her back. Her head was towards the back wall of the house, nearly two feet from the wall, at the bottom of the steps, but six or nine inches away from them. The face was turned to the right side, and the left arm was resting on the left breast. The right hand was lying down the right side. Deceased's legs were drawn up, and the clothing was above the knees.
    And once again how do we align ..

    The face and hands were besmeared with blood, as if she had struggled. She appeared to have been on her back and fought with her hands to free herself. The hands were turned toward her throat. The legs were wide apart, and there were marks of blood upon them.
    with..
    As I returned towards the back door I heard a voice say "No" just as I was going through the door. It was not in our yard, but I should think it came from the yard of No. 29. I, however, cannot say on which side it came from.
    Firstly , he does not hear a violent struggle , and secondly he is not even sure it was from the yard of 29 .. i know Cadosh and Long are the closest we have to a viable witness .. but Really !!

    Is it not just as plausible, that Cadosh was hearing the same couple that long may have witnessed ( Not Annie & killer) soon after they left one of the other yards ( Not 29 ) Is it really such a big leap to take ???

    moonbegger .

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    things that go bump

    Hello Jon.

    "the body must have been pretty much laid along the bottom of the fence.

    Either her or the killer could have bumped the fence as the assault began."

    I'm with you. Cadosch's "bump" was Annie falling.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    not much room

    Hello Dave. Thanks.

    Well, how about half of Diddles? Clearly, not much room.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    This is what I was referring to...
    (ignore the red circles)

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Cogidubnus View Post
    We hear a lot about how Cadosche heard the fence at No 29 struck by an object...(did he also see or sense it tremble?)...we are led to believe that this was Annie Chapman's demise and fall...

    However, when the body is discovered it isn't lodged against the fencing at all...it is parallel to the fencing...does anyone know for sure how far from the fencing it actually is? If there's any significant distance, then surely Cadosche's testimony is at least somewhat devalued?

    All the best

    Dave
    Hi Dave.

    Her body was said to be between the steps and the fence, but ahead of the steps of course.
    From the many photo's we have we can see that there isn't more than 2 feet between the steps and the fence.
    And, blood from her throat was said to have hit the fence, so the body must have been pretty much laid along the bottom of the fence.

    Either her or the killer could have bumped the fence as the assault began.

    Regards, Jon S.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Hello Dave. In looking at the distance between the steps and fence, it was negligible.
    Hi Lynn

    Enough room for Diddles to leap into, banging the fence?

    Dave

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X