“Was Francis Thompson Jack the Ripper?” Joseph C. Rupp, M.D., Ph.D.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FISHY1118
    Assistant Commissioner
    • May 2019
    • 3791

    #46
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    From Dr. Michael Biggs, modern day Forensic Pathologist (provided by Trevor):

    The Virchow “method” isn’t really a specific technique for removing the heart in particular, but it refers more generally to the principle of removing organs one-by-one for individual examination. My preference for most cases is to remove all the organs together as a single “block”, and then place them onto a dissection bench for systematic examination. However, in certain cases (e.g. stabbings) I will adopt the one-organ-at-a-time (Virchow) approach, as this makes it easier to follow stab wound tracks through the body (whereas removing them all together distorts measurements and makes it easier to lose track).

    Getting back to the reports you sent, where it says things like, “…the Pericardium was open below & the Heart absent…” this is what you might expect if the heart has been removed on its own (i.e. the “Virchow” method). For better access and to allow us to see the various vascular attachments, we tend to open the pericardium (fibrous sac enclosing the heart) using an inverted T-shape incision, so if the pericardium really was just “open below” then that implies that someone either didn’t know (or care) what they were doing, or didn’t have time to do it “properly”. So it goes against the person having anatomical skill/knowledge... but only very slightly…”


    So….forgive me i don't take your opinion on this matter seriously.
    Forgive me if i dont forgive you for ignoring the evidence of Medical Experts who were there at the time in favour of biggs in relation to medical skill and or knowedge .
    'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

    Comment

    • FISHY1118
      Assistant Commissioner
      • May 2019
      • 3791

      #47
      Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post

      Also, I assume that you missed the quote from Virchow himself which was shown some time ago, to the effect that surgery in Victorian times was only beginning to catch up with what slaughterers had been able to do for a long time?
      Forgive me if i dont forgive you for ignoring the evidence of Medical Experts who were there at the time in favour of biggs in relation to medical skill and or knowedge .
      'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

      Comment

      • GBinOz
        Assistant Commissioner
        • Jun 2021
        • 3255

        #48
        Prosector:

        Bond was a curious character. Although he was described as a surgeon he was in fact appointed as Surgeon to the Out Patients Department of the Westminster Hospital which meant that he hardly got to do any operative surgery himself. He committed suicide by jumping out of a window in 1901 ostensibly because he was having trouble sleeping but he was also suffering from a urinary stricture almost certainly the result of gonorrhoea.

        Although he was adamant that Jack did not possess surgical skill or anatomical knowledge don't forget that the only victim that he saw was Mary Jane and I don't think anyone could have deduced anything from that killing. She certainly was butchered and very little evidence of skill or otherwise was left although the way he extracted her heart from below through the abdominal cavity did, in my opinion, show some evidence of anatomical expertise. It's not an easy approach to the heart (he couldn't get at it through the chest although he did try because he had no rib retractors).


        I have studied all the post mortem reports in detail and those of Phillips and Brown stand out as models of their kind. Detailed, accurate and thoughtful as you'd expect from two experienced police surgeons in one of the most busy crime and accident ridden areas in 19th century Britain. They both though that the Ripper had anatomical knowledge and some degree of surgical skill but that he wasn't a fully fledged doctor. I would entirely agree with that. There is clear evidence that his technique improved from Polly Nichols to Kate Eddowes - he was on a learning curve.


        I'm a short timer. But I can still think and have opinions. That's what I do.

        Comment

        • GBinOz
          Assistant Commissioner
          • Jun 2021
          • 3255

          #49
          Interesting video here:



          A former casebook member, Moonbegger, nominates Thompson as his prime suspect, and opposes Lechmere as a suspect in Buck's Row.
          I'm a short timer. But I can still think and have opinions. That's what I do.

          Comment

          • Admin
            Administrator
            • Feb 2008
            • 233

            #50
            At this time, I would like multiple people on here, to take a deep breath and ask yourself, "Do I need a six-month break from the strife of internet life?"

            I will be happy to oblige.

            Comment

            Working...
            X